The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Survey of 800 Patients?? Knowledge, Attitudes, and Concerns Regarding Anesthesia
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to assess patients' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthetic management. A survey of 34 items was developed and administered preoperatively to 800 consecutive patients. Included were 303 men and 497 women with a mean age 52 yr and a mean educational level of 12 yr. Patients were interviewed on their knowledge of the role and training of anesthesiologists and on their preferences regarding anesthetic management. Patients also rated the intensity of their concern on 20 written statements expressing potential anesthetic complications. Results indicated that patients' perceptions of the anesthesiologist's training and role were accurate. Most patients preferred (a) general to regional anesthesia and (b) not to select their own anesthesiologist. Most significant preoperative concerns regarding the anesthesiologist focused on experience, qualifications, and presence or absence during the anesthesia. Patient concerns also included the possibility of not waking up postoperatively, experiencing pain, and becoming paralyzed. Intensity of concern was inversely related to age and unrelated to educational level or occupation. Variables related to type of concern included patient's sex, type of anesthesia, and proposed surgical procedure. Issues of least concern included disclosure of personal matters during anesthesia, experiencing impaired judgment postoperatively, and being asleep or bedridden for a prolonged period of time. It is suggested that anesthesiologists address significant patient concerns during the preoperative visit to enhance their effectiveness in patient care. Efforts to educate the public on the anesthesiologist's role in perioperative care should improve patient confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kindler, C. H., Harms, C., Amsler, F., Ihde-Scholl, T., & Scheidegger, D. (2000) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-200003000-00036 · Cited by 632
The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)
Moerman, N., van Dam, F. S. A. M., Muller, M. J., & Oosting, H. (1996) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-199603000-00002 · Cited by 632
Preoperative anxiety in adults - a cross-sectional study on specific fears and risk factors
Eberhart, L., Aust, H., Schuster, M., Sturm, T., Gehling, M., Euteneuer, F., & Rüsch, D. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02552-w · Cited by 268
Aktaş, G. K., & İlgin, V. E. (2023) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-022-06405-1 · Cited by 29
Munk, A., Reme, S. E., & Jacobsen, H. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630422 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Shevde, K., & Panagopoulos, G.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 1991-08
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 190???198
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132747042
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of 800 Patients?? Knowledge, Attitudes, and Concerns Regarding Anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/00000539-199108000-00013
- The paper
- Shevde, K., & Panagopoulos, G. (1991). A Survey of 800 Patients?? Knowledge, Attitudes, and Concerns Regarding Anesthesia. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199108000-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.