The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients
Abstract
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied during induction of anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation and increases the duration of nonhypoxic apnea in nonobese patients. PEEP also prevents atelectasis formation in morbidly obese patients. Because morbidly obese patients have difficult airway management more often and because arterial desaturation develops rapidly, we studied the clinical benefit of PEEP applied during anesthesia induction. Thirty morbidly obese patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. In the PEEP group, patients breathed 100% O(2) through a continuous positive airway pressure device (10 cm H(2)O) for 5 min. After induction of anesthesia, they were mechanically ventilated with PEEP (10 cm H(2)O) for another 5 min until tracheal intubation. In the control group, the sequence was the same but without any continuous positive airway pressure or PEEP. We measured apnea duration until Spo(2) reached 90% and we performed arterial blood gases analyses just before apnea and at 92% Spo(2). Nonhypoxic apnea duration was longer in the PEEP group compared with the control group (188 +/- 46 versus 127 +/- 43 s; P = 0.002). Pao(2) was higher before apnea in the PEEP group (P = 0.038). Application of positive airway pressure during induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients increases nonhypoxic apnea duration by 50%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pelosi, P., Croci, M., Ravagnan, I., Tredici, S., Pedoto, A., Lissoni, A., & Gattinoni, L. (1998) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/00000539-199809000-00031 · Cited by 655
Cited by
Frerk, C., Mitchell, V. S., McNarry, A. F., Mendonca, C., Bhagrath, R., Patel, A., O’Sullivan, E. P., Woodall, N. M., & Ahmad, I. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aev371 · Cited by 2,214
Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management
Weingart, S. D., & Levitan, R. M. (2012) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002 · Cited by 554
Poirier, P., Alpert, M. A., Fleisher, L. A., Thompson, P. D., Sugerman, H. J., Burke, L. E., Marceau, P., & Franklin, B. A. (2009) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.192575 · Cited by 294
The Physiologically Difficult Airway
Mosier, J., Joshi, R., Hypes, C., Pacheco, G., Valenzuela, T., & Sakles, J. (2015) · Western Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5811/westjem.2015.8.27467 · Cited by 265
The incidence of oxygen desaturation during rapid sequence induction and intubation
Gebremedhn, E. G., Mesele, D., Aemero, D., & Alemu, E. (2014) · World Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5847/wjem.j.issn.1920-8642.2014.04.007 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Gander, S., Frascarolo, P., Suter, M., Spahn, D. R., & Magnusson, L.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 580-584
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137386190
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000143339.40385.1b
- The paper
- Gander, S., Frascarolo, P., Suter, M., Spahn, D. R., & Magnusson, L. (2005). Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Induction of General Anesthesia Increases Duration of Nonhypoxic Apnea in Morbidly Obese Patients. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000143339.40385.1b
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.