The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion of Platelets and Red Blood Cells on Survival After Liver Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells (RBC) is associated with adverse outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although experimental studies have shown that platelets contribute to reperfusion injury of the liver, the influence of allogeneic platelet transfusion on outcome has not been studied in detail. In this study, we evaluate the impact of various blood products on outcome after OLT. METHODS: Twenty-nine variables, including blood product transfusions, were studied in relation to outcome in 433 adult patients undergoing a first OLT between 1989 and 2004. Data were analyzed using uni- and multivariate stepwise Cox's proportional hazards analyses, as well as propensity score-adjusted analyses for platelet transfusion to control for selection bias in the use of blood products. RESULTS: The proportion of patients receiving transfusion of any blood component decreased from 100% in the period 1989-1996 to 74% in the period 1997-2004. In uni- and multivariate analyses, the indication for transplantation, transfusion of platelets and RBC were highly dominant in predicting 1-yr patient survival. These risk factors were independent from well-accepted indices of disease, such as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and Karnofsky score. The effect on 1-yr survival was dose-related with a hazard ratio of 1.377 per unit of platelets (P = 0.01) and 1.057 per unit of RBC (P = 0.001). The negative impact of platelet transfusion on survival was confirmed by propensity-adjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study indicates that, in addition to RBC, platelet transfusions are an independent risk factor for survival after OLT. These findings have important implications for transfusion practice in liver transplant recipients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care
Hébert, P. C., Wells, G., Blajchman, M. A., Marshall, J., Martin, C., Pagliarello, G., Tweeddale, M., Schweitzer, I., & Yetisir, E. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199902113400601 · Cited by 5,187
Cited by
Hilmi, I. A., Damian, D., Al-Khafaji, A., Planinsic, R., Boucek, C., Sakai, T., Chang, C.-C. H., & Kellum, J. A. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeu556 · Cited by 284
Shander, A., Fink, A., Javidroozi, M., Erhard, J., Farmer, S. L., Corwin, H., Goodnough, L. T., Hofmann, A., Isbister, J., Ozawa, S., et al. (2011) · Transfusion Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.02.001 · Cited by 216
Alkozai, E. M., Nijsten, M. W., de Jong, K. P., de Boer, M. T., Peeters, P. M. J. G., Slooff, M. J., Porte, R. J., & Lisman, T. (2010) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b76557 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- de Boer, M. T., Christensen, M. C., Asmussen, M., van der Hilst, C. S., Hendriks, H. G. D., Slooff, M. J. H., & Porte, R. J.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-44
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152322487
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion of Platelets and Red Blood Cells on Survival After Liver Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000289638.26666.ed
- The paper
- de Boer, M. T., Christensen, M. C., Asmussen, M., van der Hilst, C. S., Hendriks, H. G. D., Slooff, M. J. H., & Porte, R. J. (2008). The Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion of Platelets and Red Blood Cells on Survival After Liver Transplantation. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000289638.26666.ed
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.