Cited by 146Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Epidural Labor Analgesia Is Associated with a Decreased Risk of Postpartum Depression: A Prospective Cohort Study

Ding, Ting, Wang, Dong-Xin, Qu, Yuan, Chen, Qian, Zhu, Sai-Nan·2014·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

Background Postpartum depression is a common psychiatric disorder in parturients after delivery. The etiology remains unclear, and multiple factors may be involved. In this study, we investigated whether epidural labor analgesia was associated with a decreased risk of postpartum depression development. Methods Two hundred fourteen parturients who were preparing for a vaginal delivery were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Epidural labor analgesia was performed in 107 of 214 patients on their request. Parturients' mental status was assessed with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 3 days and 6 weeks after delivery. A score of 10 or higher on the scale at 6 weeks was used as an indication of postpartum depression. Parturients' characteristics together with perinatal variables were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess an association between the use of epidural analgesia and the occurrence of postpartum depression. Results Postpartum depression occurred in 14.0% (15 of 107) of parturients who received epidural labor analgesia and in 34.6% (37 of 107) of those who did not (P Conclusions Epidural labor analgesia was associated with a decreased risk of postpartum depression. Further study with a large sample size is needed to evaluate the impact of epidural analgesia on the occurrence of postpartum depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0000000000000107

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, T., Wang, D.-X., Qu, Y., Chen, Q., & Zhu, S.-N.
Affiliations
Peking University First Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Ding, Ting
  • Wang, Dong-Xin
  • Qu, Yuan
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2014-08
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
383-392
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021387150
Cited by
146
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
labor epidural analgesia, postpartum depression, childbirth preparation classes, breastfeeding, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, perinatal mental health, risk factors for postpartum depression, vaginal delivery, parturients
MeSH terms
Adult, Breast Feeding, China, Female, Humans, Labor, Obstetric, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Analgesia, Epidural, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Depression, Postpartum, Prenatal Education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review