Personalizing Pediatric Pain Medicine: Using Population-Specific Pharmacogenetics, Genomics, and Other –Omics Approaches to Predict Response
Abstract
Personalized medicine is the science of individualized prevention and therapy. The notion that "one size fits all" has been replaced by the idea of patient-tailored health care. Within this paradigm, the research community has turned to examine genetic predictors of disease and treatment responses. Pain researchers have produced genetic studies over the last decade that evaluate the association of genetic variability with pain sensitivity and analgesic response. While most of these studies have been conducted among cohorts of subjects of European descent, some have included other racial and ethnic groups, providing evidence of variable responses to analgesics. Simultaneously, there is an increased recognition regarding the complexity of pain research, acknowledging the additional role of epigenetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic factors in the development, experience, and treatment of pain. This article provides an introduction to population-specific pharmacogenetics, proteomics and other "-omics" technologies to predict drug response to pain medications in children. It aims to provide anesthesiologists with the basic knowledge to understand the potential implications of genetic and epigenetic factors managing the pain of pediatric patients.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A second subset of studies found no sex differences in DNIC response.
“However, a second subset of studies have found no sex differences in DNIC response 179–181.”
From Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes (2018) · cites this paper as [180]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Jimenez, N., & Galinkin, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jimenez, Nathalia
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 183-187
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2413568575
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Keywords
- personalized medicine, pharmacogenetics, analgesic response, genetic variation, pain sensitivity, epigenetics, proteomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, drug response prediction, racial and ethnic differences, children
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Analgesics, Animals, Humans, Pain, Pain Measurement, Pediatrics, Pharmacogenetics, Phenotype, Treatment Outcome, Pain Threshold, Patient Selection, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genomics, Precision Medicine, Pain Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review