The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices
Open accessAbstract
Perioperative monitoring of blood coagulation is critical to better understand causes of hemorrhage, to guide hemostatic therapies, and to predict the risk of bleeding during the consecutive anesthetic or surgical procedures. Point-of-care (POC) coagulation monitoring devices assessing the viscoelastic properties of whole blood, i.e., thrombelastography, rotation thrombelastometry, and Sonoclot analysis, may overcome several limitations of routine coagulation tests in the perioperative setting. The advantage of these techniques is that they have the potential to measure the clotting process, starting with fibrin formation and continue through to clot retraction and fibrinolysis at the bedside, with minimal delays. Furthermore, the coagulation status of patients is assessed in whole blood, allowing the plasmatic coagulation system to interact with platelets and red cells, and thereby providing useful additional information on platelet function. Viscoelastic POC coagulation devices are increasingly being used in clinical practice, especially in the management of patients undergoing cardiac and liver surgery. Furthermore, they provide useful information in a large variety of clinical scenarios, e.g., massive hemorrhage, assessment of hypo- and hypercoagulable states, guiding pro- and anticoagulant therapies, and in diagnosing of a surgical bleeding. A surgical etiology of bleeding has to be considered when viscoelastic test results are normal. In summary, viscoelastic POC coagulation devices may help identify the cause of bleeding and guide pro- and anticoagulant therapies. To ensure optimal accuracy and performance, standardized procedures for blood sampling and handling, strict quality controls and trained personnel are required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anticoagulation and Coagulation Management for ECMO
Oliver, W. C. (2009) · Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia · doi:10.1177/1089253209347384 · Cited by 357
Haas, T., Spielmann, N., Mauch, J., Madjdpour, C., Speer, O., Schmugge, M., & Weiss, M. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer342 · Cited by 335
Haas, T., Fries, D., Tanaka, K. A., Asmis, L., Curry, N. S., & Schöchl, H. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeu303 · Cited by 249
Jain, A., Graveline, A., Waterhouse, A., Vernet, A., Flaumenhaft, R., & Ingber, D. E. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10176 · Cited by 182
Larsen, O. H., Fenger-Eriksen, C., Christiansen, K., Ingerslev, J., & Sørensen, B. (2011) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318220755c · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganter, M. T., & Hofer, C. K.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1366-1375
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025778465
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b367
- The paper
- Ganter, M. T., & Hofer, C. K. (2008). Coagulation Monitoring: Current Techniques and Clinical Use of Viscoelastic Point-of-Care Coagulation Devices. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.