The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Survey of Current Management of Neuromuscular Block in the United States and Europe
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postoperative residual neuromuscular block is a frequent occurrence. Recent surveys of clinical practice in Europe suggest that neuromuscular blocking drugs are often administered without appropriate monitoring. No comparable survey has been undertaken in the United States (US). From this survey, we compared current clinical neuromuscular practice and attitudes between anesthesia practitioners in the US and Europe. METHODS: We conducted an Internet-based survey among anesthesia practitioners in the US and Europe. The Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation and the European Society of Anaesthesiology e-mailed all of their active members, inviting them to anonymously answer a series of questions on a dedicated Internet Protocol address-sensitive website. The survey was available online for 60 days. The chi(2) test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare clinical survey items between the 2 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 2636 completed surveys were received. Most respondents from the US (64.1%) and Europe (52.2%) estimated the incidence of clinically significant postoperative residual neuromuscular weakness to be <1% (P < 0.0001). Routine pharmacologic reversal was less common in Europe than in the US (18% vs 34.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001), and quantitative monitors were available to fewer clinicians in the US (22.7%) than in Europe (70.2%) (P < 0.0001). However, 19.3% of Europeans and 9.4% of Americans never use neuromuscular monitors. Most respondents reported that neither conventional nerve stimulators nor quantitative train-of-four monitors should be part of minimum monitoring standards. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest a lack of agreement among anesthesia providers about the best way to monitor neuromuscular function. Efforts to improve awareness by developing formal training programs and/or publishing official guidelines on best practices to reduce the incidence of postoperative neuromuscular weakness and patient morbidity are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERG, H., VIBY‐MOGENSEN, J., ROED, J., MORTENSEN, C. R., ENGBÆK, J., SKOVGAARD, L. T., & KRINTEL, J. J. (1997) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04851.x · Cited by 647
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade and Critical Respiratory Events in the Postanesthesia Care Unit
Murphy, G. S., Szokol, J. W., Marymont, J. H., Greenberg, S. B., Avram, M. J., & Vender, J. S. (2008) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268 · Cited by 628
Murphy, G. S., Szokol, J. W., Marymont, J. H., Greenberg, S. B., Avram, M. J., Vender, J. S., & Nisman, M. (2008) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318182af3b · Cited by 315
Grava-Gubins, I., & Scott, S. E. (2008) · PubMed Central · Cited by 242
Neuromuscular monitoring and postoperative residual curarisation: a meta-analysis
Naguib, M., Kopman, A. F., & Ensor, J. E. (2007) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/ael386 · Cited by 240
Self-citationResidual curarization in the recovery room after vecuronium
Baillard, C., Gehan, G., Reboul-Marty, J., Larmignat, P., Samama, C. M., & Cupa, M. (2000) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013445 · Cited by 199
QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF RESIDUAL ANTIDEPOLARIZING BLOCK (PART I)
ALI, H. H., UTTING, J. E., & GRAY, T. C. (1971) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/43.5.473 · Cited by 185
CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER
Carr, T. W., Neal, D. E., Powell, P. H., & Hall, R. R. (1988) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91592-9 · Cited by 176
Postoperative muscle paralysis after rocuronium: less residual block when acceleromyography is used
Gätke, M. R., Viby-Mogensen, J., Rosenstock, C. V., Jensen, F. S., & Skovgaard, L. T. (2002) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460216.x · Cited by 111
Residual Neuromuscular Block: Rediscovering the Obvious
Brull, S. J., Naguib, M., & Miller, R. D. (2008) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181753266 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Cited by
Naguib, M., Brull, S. J., Hunter, J. M., Kopman, A. F., Fülesdi, B., Johnson, K. B., & Arkes, H. R. (2019) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000003714 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Naguib, M., Kopman, A. F., Lien, C. A., Hunter, J. M., Lopez, A., & Brull, S. J.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-119
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072883598
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 26.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey of Current Management of Neuromuscular Block in the United States and Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181c07428
- The paper
- Naguib, M., Kopman, A. F., Lien, C. A., Hunter, J. M., Lopez, A., & Brull, S. J. (2010). A Survey of Current Management of Neuromuscular Block in the United States and Europe. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181c07428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.