The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Residual Neuromuscular Block: Lessons Unlearned. Part I Definitions, Incidence, and Adverse Physiologic Effects of Residual Neuromuscular Block
Abstract
In this review, we summarize the clinical implications of residual neuromuscular block. Data suggest that residual neuromuscular block is a common complication in the postanesthesia care unit, with approximately 40% of patients exhibiting a train-of-four ratio <0.9. Volunteer studies have demonstrated that small degrees of residual paralysis (train-of-four ratios 0.7-0.9) are associated with impaired pharyngeal function and increased risk of aspiration, weakness of upper airway muscles and airway obstruction, attenuation of the hypoxic ventilatory response (approximately 30%), and unpleasant symptoms of muscle weakness. Clinical studies have also identified adverse postoperative events associated with intraoperative neuromuscular management. Large databased investigations have identified intraoperative use of muscle relaxants and residual neuromuscular block as important risk factors in anesthetic-related morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, observational and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that incomplete neuromuscular recovery during the early postoperative period may result in acute respiratory events (hypoxemia and airway obstruction), unpleasant symptoms of muscle weakness, longer postanesthesia care unit stays, delays in tracheal extubation, and an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. These recent data suggest that residual neuromuscular block is an important patient safety issue and that neuromuscular management affects postoperative outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kirmeier, E., Eriksson, L. I., Lewald, H., Jonsson Fagerlund, M., Hoeft, A., Hollmann, M., Meistelman, C., Hunter, J. M., Ulm, K., Blobner, M., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(18)30294-7 · Cited by 372
Efficacy and safety of sugammadex versus neostigmine in reversing neuromuscular blockade in adults
Hristovska, A.-M., Duch, P., Allingstrup, M., & Afshari, A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012763 · Cited by 319
Grosse-Sundrup, M., Henneman, J. P., Sandberg, W. S., Bateman, B. T., Uribe, J. V., Nguyen, N. T., Ehrenfeld, J. M., Martinez, E. A., Kurth, T., & Eikermann, M. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e6329 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, G. S., & Brull, S. J.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-128
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968706118
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Residual Neuromuscular Block: Lessons Unlearned. Part I Definitions, Incidence, and Adverse Physiologic Effects of Residual Neuromuscular Block. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181da832d
- The paper
- Murphy, G. S., & Brull, S. J. (2010). Residual Neuromuscular Block: Lessons Unlearned. Part I Definitions, Incidence, and Adverse Physiologic Effects of Residual Neuromuscular Block. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181da832d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.