The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Review of the Published Evidence
Abstract
A continuous peripheral nerve block, also termed "perineural local anesthetic infusion," involves the percutaneous insertion of a catheter adjacent to a peripheral nerve, followed by local anesthetic administration via the catheter, providing anesthesia/analgesia for multiple days or even months. Continuous peripheral nerve blocks may be provided in the hospital setting, but the use of lightweight, portable pumps permits ambulatory infusion as well. This technique's most common application is providing analgesia after surgical procedures. However, additional indications include treating intractable hiccups; inducing a sympathectomy and vasodilation to increase blood flow after a vascular accident, digit transfer/replantation, or limb salvage; alleviating vasospasm of Raynaud disease; and treating peripheral embolism and chronic pain such as complex regional pain syndrome, phantom limb pain, trigeminal neuralgia, and cancer-induced pain. After trauma, perineural infusion can provide analgesia during transportation to a distant treatment center, or while simply awaiting surgical repair. Catheter insertion may be accomplished using many possible modalities, including nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance, paresthesia induction, fluoroscopic imaging, and simple tactile perceptions ("facial click"). Either a nonstimulating epidural-type catheter may be used, or a "stimulating catheter" that delivers electrical current to its tip. Administered infusate generally includes exclusively long-acting, dilute, local anesthetic delivered as a bolus only, basal only, or basal-bolus combination. Documented benefits appear to be dependent on successfully improving analgesia, and include decreasing baseline/breakthrough/dynamic pain, supplemental analgesic requirements, opioid-related side effects, and sleep disturbances. In some cases, patient satisfaction and ambulation/functioning may be improved; an accelerated resumption of passive joint range-of-motion realized; and the time until discharge readiness as well as actual discharge from the hospital or rehabilitation center achieved. Lastly, postoperative joint inflammation and inflammatory markers may be decreased. Nearly all benefits occur during the infusion itself, but several randomized controlled trials suggest that in some situations there are prolonged benefits after catheter removal as well. Easily rectified minor complications occur somewhat frequently, but major risks including clinically relevant infection and nerve injury are relatively rare. This article is an evidence-based review of the published literature involving continuous peripheral nerve blocks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horlocker, T. T., Wedel, D. J., Rowlingson, J. C., Enneking, F. K., Kopp, S. L., Benzon, H. T., Brown, D. L., Heit, J. A., Mulroy, M. F., Rosenquist, R. W., et al. (2010) · Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine · doi:10.1097/aap.0b013e3181c15c70 · Cited by 1,501
Capdevila, X., Barthelet, Y., Biboulet, P., Ryckwaert, Y., Rubenovitch, J., & d'Athis, F. (1999) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199907000-00006 · Cited by 1,028
Does Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Provide Superior Pain Control to Opioids? A Meta-Analysis
Richman, J. M., Liu, S. S., Courpas, G., Wong, R., Rowlingson, A. J., McGready, J., Cohen, S. R., & Wu, C. L. (2006) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000181289.09675.7d · Cited by 687
Maximum recommended doses of local anesthetics: A multifactorial concept
ROSENBERG, P., VEERING, B., & URMEY, W. (2004) · Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rapm.2004.08.003 · Cited by 516
Fowler, S. J., Symons, J., Sabato, S., & Myles, P. S. (2008) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aem373 · Cited by 507
Survey of postoperative analgesia following ambulatory surgery
Rawal, N., Hylander, J., NYDAHL, R., Olofsson, I., & Gupta, A. (1997) · Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04829.x · Cited by 260
Carli, F., Clemente, A., Asenjo, J. F., Kim, D. J., Mistraletti, G., Gomarasca, M., Morabito, A., & Tanzer, M. (2010) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeq112 · Cited by 232
Picard, P. R., Tramèr, M. R., McQuay, H. J., & Moore, A. R. (1997) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00040-7 · Cited by 223
Zink, W., Seif, C., Bohl, J. R. E., Hacke, N., Braun, P. M., Sinner, B., Martin, E., Fink, R. H. A., & Graf, A. B. M. (2003) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000080610.14265.c8 · Cited by 214
White, P. F., Issioui, T., Skrivanek, G. D., Early, J. S., & Wakefield, C. (2003) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000082242.84015.d4 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Enhanced recovery after surgery for primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a review of the evidence
Soffin, E. M., & YaDeau, J. T. (2016) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aew362 · Cited by 339
Acute Pain Service: Past, Present and Future
Tawfic, Q. A., & Faris, A. S. (2015) · Pain Management · doi:10.2217/pmt.14.48 · Cited by 29
Commonly Used Opioids in the Orthopedic Operating Room: A Narrative Review
Nguyen, A., Donnelly, J., Robinson, C. L., & Hasoon, J. (2026) · Orthopedic Reviews · doi:10.52965/001c.158576 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ilfeld, B. M.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 904-925
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041439514
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 35.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Review of the Published Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/ane.0b013e3182285e01
- The paper
- Ilfeld, B. M. (2011). Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Review of the Published Evidence. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3182285e01
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.