Cited by 215Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismPharmaceutical studies and practices

A Placebo- and Midazolam-Controlled Phase I Single Ascending-Dose Study Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam (CNS 7056): Part II. Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Simulation

Wiltshire, Hugh R., Kilpatrick, Gavin J., Tilbrook, Gary S., Borkett, Keith M.·2012·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

Background A new benzodiazepine, remimazolam, which is rapidly metabolized by tissue esterases to an inactive metabolite, has been developed to permit a fast onset, a short, predictable duration of sedative action, and a more rapid recovery profile than currently available drugs. We report on modeling of the data and simulations of dosage regimens for future study. Methods A phase I, single-center, double-blind, placebo and active controlled, randomized, single-dose escalation study was conducted. Fifty-four healthy subjects in 9 groups received a single 1-minute IV infusion of remimazolam (0.01-0.3 mg/kg). There were 18 control subjects taking midazolam and 9 placebos. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of the data was undertaken and the parameters obtained were used for Monte-Carlo simulations of alternative dosing regimens. Results A 4-compartment mammillary pharmacokinetic model of midazolam and a physiologically based recirculation model of remimazolam were fitted to the observed plasma levels. The recirculation model of remimazolam explained the observed high venous, compared with arterial, concentrations at later time points. The 2 models were used to simulate the arterial concentrations required for the pharmacodynamic models of sedation (Bispectral Index and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation [MOAA/S]) and gave population mean pharmacodynamic parameters as follows: Bispectral Index-IC(50): 0.26, 0.07 μg/mL; γ: 1.6, 8.6; k(e0): 0…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0b013e318241f68a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wiltshire, H. R., Kilpatrick, G. J., Tilbrook, G. S., & Borkett, K. M.
Affiliations
Paion (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Wiltshire, Hugh R.
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2012-08
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
284-296
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977462728
Cited by
215
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
Keywords
remimazolam, benzodiazepines, midazolam, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, sedation, bispectral index, population pharmacokinetic model, dose simulation, drug safety, healthy volunteers, single ascending dose, intravenous infusion
MeSH terms
Adult, Benzodiazepines, Computer Simulation, Consciousness, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Maryland, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Midazolam, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Monte Carlo Method, Placebos, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Consciousness Monitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review