The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences
Open accessAbstract
An empirical Bayes approach to the estimation of possibly sparse sequences observed in Gaussian white noise is set out and investigated. The prior considered is a mixture of an atom of probability at zero and a heavy-tailed density γ, with the mixing weight chosen by marginal maximum likelihood, in the hope of adapting between sparse and dense sequences. If estimation is then carried out using the posterior median, this is a random thresholding procedure. Other thresholding rules employing the same threshold can also be used. Probability bounds on the threshold chosen by the marginal maximum likelihood approach lead to overall risk bounds over classes of signal sequences of length n, allowing for sparsity of various kinds and degrees. The signal classes considered are “nearly black” sequences where only a proportion η is allowed to be nonzero, and sequences with normalized ℓp norm bounded by η, for η>0 and 0 1. Simulations show excellent performance. For appropriately chosen functions γ, the method is computationally tractable and software is available. The extension to a modified thresholding method relevant to the estimation of very sparse sequences is also considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calibration and empirical Bayes variable selection
George, E. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.4.731 · Cited by 520
Cited by
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors
Ge, T., Chen, C.-Y., Ni, Y., Feng, Y.-C. A., & Smoller, J. W. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5 · Cited by 1,922
Donoho, D. L., Tsaig, Y., Drori, I., & Starck, J.-L. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2011.2173241 · Cited by 1,509
The horseshoe estimator for sparse signals
Carvalho, C. M., Polson, N. G., & Scott, J. G. (2010) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asq017 · Cited by 1,381
Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons
Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Yajima, M. (2012) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2011.618213 · Cited by 1,274
Dimensionality Reduction for Supervised Learning With Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces
Fukumizu, K., Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · doi:10.21236/ada446572 · Cited by 723
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnstone, I. M., & Silverman, B. W.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1594-1649
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991108537
- Cited by
- 456
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/009053604000000030
- The paper
- Johnstone, I. M., & Silverman, B. W. (2004). Needles and straw in haystacks: Empirical Bayes estimates of possibly sparse sequences. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.