The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dimensionality Reduction for Supervised Learning With Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces
Abstract
We propose a novel method of dimensionality reduction for supervised learning problems. Given a regression or classification problem in which we wish to predict a response variable $Y$ from an explanatory variable $X$, we treat the problem of dimensionality reduction as that of finding a low-dimensional ``effective subspace'' of $X$ which retains the statistical relationship between $X$ and $Y$. We show that this problem can be formulated in terms of conditional independence. To turn this formulation into an optimization problem we establish a general nonparametric characterization of conditional independence using covariance operators on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. This characterization allows us to derive a contrast function for estimation of the effective subspace. Unlike many conventional methods for dimensionality reduction in supervised learning, the proposed method requires neither assumptions on the marginal distribution of $X$, nor a parametric model of the conditional distribution of $Y$. We present experiments that compare the performance of the method with conventional methods.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If the kernel K is a characteristic kernel, the mean embedding of a distribution induced by the kernel is injective, so MMD(p,q)=0 if and only if p=q.
“If the kernel 𝐾 is a characteristic kernel , the mean embedding of a distribution induced by the kernel is injective [20]. In other words, the mean embedding of a distribution is unique to that distribution. As a consequence, MMD ( 𝑝, 𝑞 ) = 0 if and only if 𝑝 = 𝑞 .”
From Bandwidth-Optimal Random Shuffling for GPUs (2022) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1993.10476353 · Cited by 2,828
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
brms : An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan
Bürkner, P.-C. (2017) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01 · Cited by 9,476
Bandwidth-Optimal Random Shuffling for GPUs
Mitchell, R., Stokes, D., Frank, E., & Holmes, G. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing · doi:10.1145/3505287 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fukumizu, K., Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I.
- Affiliations
- The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
- University of Chicago (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 2003-05-25
- OpenAlex
- W2157801062
- Cited by
- 723
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- UC Berkeley (submittedVersion)
- Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- dimensionality reduction, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, conditional independence, covariance operator, supervised learning, nonparametric estimation, contrast function, regression analysis, classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review