Cited by 723Face and Expression RecognitionStatistical Methods and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimensionality Reduction for Supervised Learning With Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces

Abstract

We propose a novel method of dimensionality reduction for supervised learning problems. Given a regression or classification problem in which we wish to predict a response variable $Y$ from an explanatory variable $X$, we treat the problem of dimensionality reduction as that of finding a low-dimensional ``effective subspace'' of $X$ which retains the statistical relationship between $X$ and $Y$. We show that this problem can be formulated in terms of conditional independence. To turn this formulation into an optimization problem we establish a general nonparametric characterization of conditional independence using covariance operators on a reproducing kernel Hilbert space. This characterization allows us to derive a contrast function for estimation of the effective subspace. Unlike many conventional methods for dimensionality reduction in supervised learning, the proposed method requires neither assumptions on the marginal distribution of $X$, nor a parametric model of the conditional distribution of $Y$. We present experiments that compare the performance of the method with conventional methods.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21236/ada446572

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the kernel K is a characteristic kernel, the mean embedding of a distribution induced by the kernel is injective, so MMD(p,q)=0 if and only if p=q.

    “If the kernel 𝐾 is a characteristic kernel , the mean embedding of a distribution induced by the kernel is injective [20]. In other words, the mean embedding of a distribution is unique to that distribution. As a consequence, MMD ( 𝑝, 𝑞 ) = 0 if and only if 𝑝 = 𝑞 .”

    From Bandwidth-Optimal Random Shuffling for GPUs (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fukumizu, K., Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I.
Affiliations
  • The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Published
2003-05-25
OpenAlex
W2157801062
Cited by
723
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 75 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 27
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • UC Berkeley (submittedVersion)
  • Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
dimensionality reduction, reproducing kernel Hilbert space, conditional independence, covariance operator, supervised learning, nonparametric estimation, contrast function, regression analysis, classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review