The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy and robust Bayesian decision theory
Open accessAbstract
We describe and develop a close relationship between two problems that have customarily been regarded as distinct: that of maximizing entropy, and that of minimizing worst-case expected loss. Using a formulation grounded in the equilibrium theory of zero-sum games between Decision Maker and Nature, these two problems are shown to be dual to each other, the solution to each providing that to the other. Although Topsøe described this connection for the Shannon entropy over 20 years ago, it does not appear to be widely known even in that important special case. We here generalize this theory to apply to arbitrary decision problems and loss functions. We indicate how an appropriate generalized definition of entropy can be associated with such a problem, and we show that, subject to certain regularity conditions, the above-mentioned duality continues to apply in this extended context. This simultaneously provides a possible rationale for maximizing entropy and a tool for finding robust Bayes acts. We also describe the essential identity between the problem of maximizing entropy and that of minimizing a related discrepancy or divergence between distributions. This leads to an extension, to arbitrary discrepancies, of a well-known minimax theorem for the case of Kullback–Leibler divergence (the “redundancy-capacity theorem” of information theory). For the important case of families of distributions having certain mean values specified, we develop simple sufficient conditions and methods for identifying the desired solutions. We use this theory to introduce a new concept of “generalized exponential family” linked to the specific decision problem under consideration, and we demonstrate that this shares many of the properties of standard exponential families. Finally, we show that the existence of an equilibrium in our game can be rephrased in terms of a “Pythagorean property” of the related divergence, thus generalizing previously announced results for Kullback–Leibler and Bregman divergences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Elements of Information Theory
Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (2001) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/0471200611 · Cited by 36,808
Convergence of Probability Measures
Billingsley, P. (1999) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316962 · Cited by 13,910
Information theory and statistical mechanics
Jaynes, E. T. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.106.620 · Cited by 12,931
Rockafellar, R. T. (1970) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400873173 · Cited by 10,801
Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis
Berger, J. O. (1985) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2 · Cited by 7,722
Information theory and statistics
(1959) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(59)90368-0 · Cited by 7,094
On Measures of Entropy and Information
Rényi, A. (1961) · Project Euclid (Cornell University) · Cited by 4,031
Optimal Statistical Decisions.
Siegmund, D., & DeGroot, M. H. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284675 · Cited by 3,386
Stastical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis.
Ghosh, M., & Berger, J. (1988) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288950 · Cited by 2,905
Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities
Walley, P. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3472-7 · Cited by 2,655
Cited by
Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation
Phillips, S. J., & Dudík, M. (2008) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x · Cited by 5,890
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793
Accuracy and the Laws of Credence
Pettigrew, R. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732716.001.0001 · Cited by 473
A tutorial introduction to the minimum description length principle
Grunwald, P. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0406077 · Cited by 293
Simple and principled uncertainty estimation with deterministic deep learning via distance awareness
Liu, J. Z., Lin, Z., Padhy, S., Tran, D., Bedrax-Weiss, T., & Lakshminarayanan, B. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10108 · Cited by 237
Metadata
- Authors
- Grünwald, P. D., & Dawid, A. P.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1367-1433
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1590693676
- Cited by
- 454
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 22.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy and robust Bayesian decision theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/009053604000000553
- The paper
- Grünwald, P. D., & Dawid, A. P. (2004). Game theory, maximum entropy, minimum discrepancy and robust Bayesian decision theory. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/009053604000000553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.