The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sparsity and bias of the Lasso selection in high-dimensional linear regression
Open accessAbstract
Meinshausen and Buhlmann [Ann. Statist. 34 (2006) 1436–1462] showed that, for neighborhood selection in Gaussian graphical models, under a neighborhood stability condition, the LASSO is consistent, even when the number of variables is of greater order than the sample size. Zhao and Yu [(2006) J. Machine Learning Research 7 2541–2567] formalized the neighborhood stability condition in the context of linear regression as a strong irrepresentable condition. That paper showed that under this condition, the LASSO selects exactly the set of nonzero regression coefficients, provided that these coefficients are bounded away from zero at a certain rate. In this paper, the regression coefficients outside an ideal model are assumed to be small, but not necessarily zero. Under a sparse Riesz condition on the correlation of design variables, we prove that the LASSO selects a model of the correct order of dimensionality, controls the bias of the selected model at a level determined by the contributions of small regression coefficients and threshold bias, and selects all coefficients of greater order than the bias of the selected model. Moreover, as a consequence of this rate consistency of the LASSO in model selection, it is proved that the sum of error squares for the mean response and the ℓα-loss for the regression coefficients converge at the best possible rates under the given conditions. An interesting aspect of our results is that the logarithm of the number of variables can be of the same order as the sample size for certain random dependent designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Cited by
High-dimensional regression with noisy and missing data: Provable guarantees with nonconvexity
Loh, P.-L., & Wainwright, M. J. (2012) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/12-aos1018 · Cited by 529
Multiple predicting K -fold cross-validation for model selection
Jung, Y. (2018) · Journal of Nonparametric Statistics · doi:10.1080/10485252.2017.1404598 · Cited by 499
Tests for High-Dimensional Covariance Matrices
Chen, S. X., Zhang, L.-X., & Zhong, P.-S. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09560 · Cited by 329
Outlier Detection Using Nonconvex Penalized Regression
She, Y., & Owen, A. B. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10390 · Cited by 310
Bayesian linear regression with sparse priors
Castillo, I., Schmidt-Hieber, J., & van der Vaart, A. (2015) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aos1334 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, C.-H., & Huang, J.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1567-1594
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2147631685
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sparsity and bias of the Lasso selection in high-dimensional linear regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/07-aos520
- The paper
- Zhang, C.-H., & Huang, J. (2008). The sparsity and bias of the Lasso selection in high-dimensional linear regression. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aos520
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.