The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Near-ideal model selection by ℓ1 minimization
Open accessAbstract
We consider the fundamental problem of estimating the mean of a vector y=Xβ+z, where X is an n×p design matrix in which one can have far more variables than observations, and z is a stochastic error term—the so-called “p>n” setup. When β is sparse, or, more generally, when there is a sparse subset of covariates providing a close approximation to the unknown mean vector, we ask whether or not it is possible to accurately estimate Xβ using a computationally tractable algorithm. We show that, in a surprisingly wide range of situations, the lasso happens to nearly select the best subset of variables. Quantitatively speaking, we prove that solving a simple quadratic program achieves a squared error within a logarithmic factor of the ideal mean squared error that one would achieve with an oracle supplying perfect information about which variables should and should not be included in the model. Interestingly, our results describe the average performance of the lasso; that is, the performance one can expect in an vast majority of cases where Xβ is a sparse or nearly sparse superposition of variables, but not in all cases. Our results are nonasymptotic and widely applicable, since they simply require that pairs of predictor variables are not too collinear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Cited by
Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., & Eckstein, J. (2011) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000016 · Cited by 17,075
Computational Methods for Sparse Solution of Linear Inverse Problems
Tropp, J. A., & Wright, S. J. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2044010 · Cited by 1,046
NESTA: A Fast and Accurate First-Order Method for Sparse Recovery
Becker, S., Bobin, J., & Candès, E. J. (2011) · SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences · doi:10.1137/090756855 · Cited by 848
Self-citationPanning for Gold: ‘Model-X’ Knockoffs for High Dimensional Controlled Variable Selection
Candès, E., Fan, Y., Janson, L., & Lv, J. (2018) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12265 · Cited by 632
Self-citationA significance test for the lasso
Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J., & Tibshirani, R. (2014) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-aos1175 · Cited by 541
The lasso problem and uniqueness
Tibshirani, R. J. (2013) · Electronic Journal of Statistics · doi:10.1214/13-ejs815 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Candès, E. J., & Plan, Y.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5A
- Pages
- 2145-2177
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115447612
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.