The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Support union recovery in high-dimensional multivariate regression
Open accessAbstract
In multivariate regression, a K-dimensional response vector is regressed upon a common set of p covariates, with a matrix B∗ ∈ ℝp × K of regression coefficients. We study the behavior of the multivariate group Lasso, in which block regularization based on the ℓ1 ∕ ℓ2 norm is used for support union recovery, or recovery of the set of s rows for which B∗ is nonzero. Under high-dimensional scaling, we show that the multivariate group Lasso exhibits a threshold for the recovery of the exact row pattern with high probability over the random design and noise that is specified by the sample complexity parameter θ(n, p, s) := n ∕ [2ψ(B∗) log(p − s)]. Here n is the sample size, and ψ(B∗) is a sparsity-overlap function measuring a combination of the sparsities and overlaps of the K-regression coefficient vectors that constitute the model. We prove that the multivariate group Lasso succeeds for problem sequences (n, p, s) such that θ(n, p, s) exceeds a critical level θu, and fails for sequences such that θ(n, p, s) lies below a critical level θℓ. For the special case of the standard Gaussian ensemble, we show that θℓ = θu so that the characterization is sharp. The sparsity-overlap function ψ(B∗) reveals that, if the design is uncorrelated on the active rows, ℓ1 ∕ ℓ2 regularization for multivariate regression never harms performance relative to an ordinary Lasso approach and can yield substantial improvements in sample complexity (up to a factor of K) when the coefficient vectors are suitably orthogonal. For more general designs, it is possible for the ordinary Lasso to outperform the multivariate group Lasso. We complement our analysis with simulations that demonstrate the sharpness of our theoretical results, even for relatively small problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Multiple kernel learning, conic duality, and the SMO algorithm
Bach, F. R., Lanckriet, G. R. G., & Jordan, M. I. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015424 · Cited by 1,453
Self-citationConcentration Inequalities and Model Selection
(2007) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48503-2 · Cited by 744
Cited by
A Survey on Multi-Task Learning
Zhang, Y., & Yang, Q. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.08114 · Cited by 2,910
High-dimensional Ising model selection using ℓ1-regularized logistic regression
Ravikumar, P., Wainwright, M. J., & Lafferty, J. D. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos691 · Cited by 892
Self-citationEstimation of (near) low-rank matrices with noise and high-dimensional scaling
Negahban, S., & Wainwright, M. J. (2011) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/10-aos850 · Cited by 537
Self-citationHuang, J., & Zhang, T. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos778 · Cited by 521
Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations
Farrell, M. H. (2015) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.017 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Obozinski, G., Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan, M. I.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-47
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125536150
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Support union recovery in high-dimensional multivariate regression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/09-aos776
- The paper
- Obozinski, G., Wainwright, M. J., & Jordan, M. I. (2011). Support union recovery in high-dimensional multivariate regression. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/09-aos776
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.