The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ℓ1-penalized quantile regression in high-dimensional sparse models
Open accessAbstract
We consider median regression and, more generally, a possibly infinite collection of quantile regressions in high-dimensional sparse models. In these models, the number of regressors p is very large, possibly larger than the sample size n, but only at most s regressors have a nonzero impact on each conditional quantile of the response variable, where s grows more slowly than n. Since ordinary quantile regression is not consistent in this case, we consider ℓ1-penalized quantile regression (ℓ1-QR), which penalizes the ℓ1-norm of regression coefficients, as well as the post-penalized QR estimator (post-ℓ1-QR), which applies ordinary QR to the model selected by ℓ1-QR. First, we show that under general conditions ℓ1-QR is consistent at the near-oracle rate $\sqrt{s/n}\sqrt{\log(p\vee n)}$, uniformly in the compact set $\mathcal{U}\subset(0,1)$ of quantile indices. In deriving this result, we propose a partly pivotal, data-driven choice of the penalty level and show that it satisfies the requirements for achieving this rate. Second, we show that under similar conditions post-ℓ1-QR is consistent at the near-oracle rate $\sqrt{s/n}\sqrt{\log(p\vee n)}$, uniformly over $\mathcal{U}$, even if the ℓ1-QR-selected models miss some components of the true models, and the rate could be even closer to the oracle rate otherwise. Third, we characterize conditions under which ℓ1-QR contains the true model as a submodel, and derive bounds on the dimension of the selected model, uniformly over $\mathcal{U}$; we also provide conditions under which hard-thresholding selects the minimal true model, uniformly over $\mathcal{U}$.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Cited by
From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics
Bertsimas, D., & Kallus, N. (2020) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3253 · Cited by 784
High-Dimensional Methods and Inference on Structural and Treatment Effects
Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Hansen, C. (2014) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.28.2.29 · Cited by 722
Self-citationDouble/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters
Newey, W. K., Hansen, C., Duflo, E., Robins, J., Chernozhukov, V., Demirer, M., & Chetverikov, D. (2017) · doi:10.1920/wp.cem.2017.2817 · Cited by 486
Self-citationTENET: Tail-Event driven NETwork risk
Härdle, W. K., Wang, W., & Yu, L. (2016) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.02.013 · Cited by 470
Robust inference on average treatment effects with possibly more covariates than observations
Farrell, M. H. (2015) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.06.017 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Belloni, A., & Chernozhukov, V.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2011-02-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-130
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125188740
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ℓ1-penalized quantile regression in high-dimensional sparse models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/10-aos827
- The paper
- Belloni, A., & Chernozhukov, V. (2011). ℓ1-penalized quantile regression in high-dimensional sparse models. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/10-aos827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.