Latent variable graphical model selection via convex optimization
Open accessAbstract
Suppose we observe samples of a subset of a collection of random variables. No additional information is provided about the number of latent variables, nor of the relationship between the latent and observed variables. Is it possible to discover the number of latent components, and to learn a statistical model over the entire collection of variables? We address this question in the setting in which the latent and observed variables are jointly Gaussian, with the conditional statistics of the observed variables conditioned on the latent variables being specified by a graphical model. As a first step we give natural conditions under which such latent-variable Gaussian graphical models are identifiable given marginal statistics of only the observed variables. Essentially these conditions require that the conditional graphical model among the observed variables is sparse, while the effect of the latent variables is “spread out” over most of the observed variables. Next we propose a tractable convex program based on regularized maximum-likelihood for model selection in this latent-variable setting; the regularizer uses both the $\ell_{1}$ norm and the nuclear norm. Our modeling framework can be viewed as a combination of dimensionality reduction (to identify latent variables) and graphical modeling (to capture remaining statistical structure not attributable to the latent variables), and it consistently estimates both the number of latent components and the conditional graphical model structure among the observed variables. These results are applicable in the high-dimensional setting in which the number of latent/observed variables grows with the number of samples of the observed variables. The geometric properties of the algebraic varieties of sparse matrices and of low-rank matrices play an important role in our analysis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A sparse + low-rank decomposition can reveal the structure obscured by latent variables.
“However, the presence of the latent variables (C1) obscures this structure-but a sparse + low-rank decomposition can reveal it (Chandrasekaran et al., 2012).”
From CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluation (2026) · cites this paper as Chandrasekaran et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505 · see citing works
A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices
Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/s0047-259x(03)00096-4 · Cited by 3,046 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- CANDÈS, E. J., LI, X., MA, Y. and WRIGHT, J. (2011). Robust principal component analysis? J. ACM 58 Art. 11, 37. MR2811000
- CANDÈS, E. J., ROMBERG, J. and TAO, T. (2006). Robust uncertainty principles: Exact sig- nal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 489-509. MR2236170
- CHANDRASEKARAN, V., PARRILO, P. A. and WILLSKY, A. S. (2011). Supplement to "Latent variable graphical model selection via convex optimization." DOI:10.1214/11- AOS949SUPP. · DOI
- DONOHO, D. L. (2006). Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52 1289-1306. MR2241189
- FAZEL, M. (2002). Matrix rank minimization with applications. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. Elec. Eng., Stanford Univ.
- HORN, R. A. and JOHNSON, C. R. (1990). Matrix Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cam- bridge. MR1084815
- LAURITZEN, S. L. (1996). Graphical Models. Oxford Statistical Science Series 17. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. MR1419991
- LÖFBERG, J. (2004). YALMIP: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In Pro- ceedings of the CACSD Conference, Taiwan. Available at http://control.ee.ethz.ch/~joloef/ yalmip.php.
- ORTEGA, J. M. and RHEINBOLDT, W. C. (1970). Iterative Solution of Nonlinear Equations in Several Variables. Academic Press, New York. MR0273810
- ROCKAFELLAR, R. T. (1996). Convex Analysis. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ. MR1451876
- WAINWRIGHT, M. J. (2009). Sharp thresholds for high-dimensional and noisy sparsity recov- ery using ℓ 1 -constrained quadratic programming (Lasso). IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 55 2183-2202. MR2729873
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102 · see citing works
A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks
Epskamp, S., & Fried, E. I. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000167 · Cited by 2,918 · see citing works
Hallquist, M. N., Wright, A. G. C., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2021) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2019.1640103 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
CARE: Confounder-Aware Aggregation for Reliable LLM Evaluation
Zhao, J., Shin, C., Huang, T.-H., GNVV, S. S. S. N., & Sala, F. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.00039
- Authors
- Chandrasekaran, V., Parrilo, P. A., & Willsky, A. S.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Parrilo, Pablo A.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2012-08-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1935-1967
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-8966
- OpenAlex
- W2763292376
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 26.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Statistics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0757207)
- Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-06-1-0303, FA9550-06-1-0324)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Keywords
- latent variable models, Gaussian graphical models, model selection, convex optimization, nuclear norm regularization, L1 regularization, identifiability, dimensionality reduction, low-rank matrices, algebraic varieties, high-dimensional statistics, regularized maximum likelihood
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review