Cited by 3,046Statistical Methods and InferenceRandom Matrices and ApplicationsAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices

Open access
Ledoit, Olivier, Wolf, Michael·2004·Journal of Multivariate Analysis

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-259x(03)00096-4

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage computes the optimal shrinkage coefficient α by finding a bias-variance trade-off with no assumption on the data distribution.

    “The optimal value of α is computed by finding a bias-variance trade-off with no assumption on the data distribution.”

    From Signal Estimation and Uncertainties Extraction in Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    Section 2.2 describes the optimal shrinkage estimator as a trade-off between bias and variance, and Section 2.1 derives the optimal shrinkage weight. Section 2.1 says the method does not require a specific data distribution, but it does require finite fourth moments. Thus, the claim's unqualified statement that it makes no assumption on the data distribution is too broad. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]1. S.A. Aivazyan, I.S. Yenukov, L.D. Meshalkin, Applied Statistics, Reference Edition M., Finances and Statistics, 1985 (Russian).
  2. [15]15. S.P. Lin, M.D. Perlman, A Monte-Carlo comparison of four estimators of a covariance matrix, in: P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis, Vol. VI, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 411-429.
  3. [23]23. H. Theil, K. Laitinen, Singular moment matrix in applied econometrics, in: P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.), Multivariate Analysis, Vol. V, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 629-649.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES)
Corresponding author
Wolf, Michael
Venue
Journal of Multivariate Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
365-411
ISSN
0047-259X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062125287
Cited by
3,046
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 355 · 2025: 228 · 2024: 191 · 2023: 178 · 2022: 178 · 2021: 193 · 2020: 198 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 199 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 137 · 2013: 108 · 2012: 99
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Multivariate Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • e-Archivo (Carlos III University of Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Random Matrices and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
covariance matrix estimation, sample covariance matrix, convex combination, asymptotic optimality, squared error loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review