The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable selection for sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression with an application to microbiome data analysis
Open accessAbstract
With the development of next generation sequencing technology, researchers have now been able to study the microbiome composition using direct sequencing, whose output are bacterial taxa counts for each microbiome sample. One goal of microbiome study is to associate the microbiome composition with environmental covariates. We propose to model the taxa counts using a Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) regression model in order to account for overdispersion of observed counts. The DM regression model can be used for testing the association between taxa composition and covariates using the likelihood ratio test. However, when the number of the covariates is large, multiple testing can lead to loss of power. To deal with the high dimensionality of the problem, we develop a penalized likelihood approach to estimate the regression parameters and to select the variables by imposing a sparse group [Formula: see text] penalty to encourage both group-level and within-group sparsity. Such a variable selection procedure can lead to selection of the relevant covariates and their associated bacterial taxa. An efficient block-coordinate descent algorithm is developed to solve the optimization problem. We present extensive simulations to demonstrate that the sparse DM regression can result in better identification of the microbiome-associated covariates than models that ignore overdispersion or only consider the proportions. We demonstrate the power of our method in an analysis of a data set evaluating the effects of nutrient intake on human gut microbiome composition. Our results have clearly shown that the nutrient intake is strongly associated with the human gut microbiome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While both the multinomial Dirichlet model and the multinomial logistic normal model can handle over-dispersed count data70,71, the logistic normal model also allows for both positive and negative covariation between microbial features69.”
From Longitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data
Caporaso, J. G., Kuczynski, J., Stombaugh, J., Bittinger, K., Bushman, F. D., Costello, E. K., Fierer, N., Peña, A. G., Goodrich, J. K., Gordon, J. I., et al. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.f.303 · Cited by 34,887 · cited 2×
“…are either mapped to an existing phylogenetic tree in a taxonomic dependent way [e.g., Mat-sen, Kodner and Armbrust (2010)] or clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a certain similarity level in a taxonomic independent way [e.g., Caporaso et al. (2010), Schloss et al. (2009)].”
Schloss, P. D., Westcott, S. L., Ryabin, T., Hall, J. R., Hartmann, M., Hollister, E. B., Lesniewski, R. A., Oakley, B. B., Parks, D. H., Robinson, C. J., et al. (2009) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01541-09 · Cited by 19,549 · cited 1×
“…are either mapped to an existing phylogenetic tree in a taxonomic dependent way [e.g., Mat-sen, Kodner and Armbrust (2010)] or clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at a certain similarity level in a taxonomic independent way [e.g., Caporaso et al. (2010), Schloss et al. (2009)].”
Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes
Wu, G. D., Chen, J., Hoffmann, C., Bittinger, K., Chen, Y.-Y., Keilbaugh, S. A., Bewtra, M., Knights, D., Walters, W. A., Knight, R., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1208344 · Cited by 6,513 · cited 10×
“Details of the study and the data set can be found in Section 6 and in Wu et al. (2011).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationHost-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine
Bäckhed, F., Ley, R. E., Sonnenburg, J. L., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104816 · Cited by 5,277 · cited 1×
“The collective genomes of these microbes constitute an extended human genome that provides us with genetic and metabolic capabilities that we do not inherently possess [B¨ackhed et al. (2005)].”
BackgroundSokol, H., Pigneur, B., Watterlot, L., Lakhdari, O., Bermúdez-Humarán, L. G., Gratadoux, J.-J., Blugeon, S., Bridonneau, C., Furet, J.-P., Corthier, G., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804812105 · Cited by 4,413 · cited 1×
“For example, we found that Naringenin (flavanone) was positively associated with Faecalibacterium, an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn’s disease patients [Sokol et al. (2008)].”
BackgroundFITTING MULTIVARIATE MODELS TO COMMUNITY DATA: A COMMENT ON DISTANCE-BASED REDUNDANCY ANALYSIS
McArdle, B. H., & Anderson, M. J. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0290:fmmtcd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,001 · cited 1×
“en calculated and the signifi- cance is then evaluated by permutation test. Alternatively, one can define a distance between the samples and then use a PERMANOVA procedure to test for covariate effects [McArdle (2001)]. It is easy to show that when the distance is Euclidean, these two procedures are equivalent. In this p…”
MethodThe Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data
Aitchison, J. (1982) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1982.tb01195.x · Cited by 3,457
The Group Lasso for Logistic Regression
Meier, L., van de Geer, S., & Bühlmann, P. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00627.x · Cited by 1,681 · cited 3×
“· Minimization of (11) with respective to d ¯ Sk can be performed in a similar fashion as in Meier, van de Geer and B¨uhlmann (2008) for the group ℓ 1 penalty.”
InfluentialBenson, A. K., Kelly, S. A., Legge, R., Ma, F., Low, S. J., Kim, J., Zhang, M., Oh, P. L., Nehrenberg, D., Hua, K., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1007028107 · Cited by 1,314 · cited 1×
“Benson et al. (2010) demonstrated that genetic variants are associated with the mouse gut microbiome.”
Matsen, F. A., IV, Kodner, R. B., & Armbrust, E. V. (2010) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 · Cited by 1,058
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (2002). Numerical Ecology, 2nd ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Normalization and microbial differential abundance strategies depend upon data characteristics
Weiss, S. J., Xu, Z. Z., Peddada, S. D., Amir, A., Bittinger, K. L., González, A., Lozupone, C., Zaneveld, J., Vázquez‐Baeza, Y., Birmingham, A., et al. (2017) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-017-0237-y · Cited by 2,231
“[50, 67, 68], we include those distributions in our simulation study for purely comparative purposes.”
MethodAnalysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition
Mandal, S., Van Treuren, W., White, R. A., Eggesbø, M., Knight, R., & Peddada, S. D. (2015) · Microbial Ecology in Health & Disease · doi:10.3402/mehd.v26.27663 · Cited by 1,942
“As typically done (13), to avoid sparsely observed OTUs,”
BackgroundSparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks
Kurtz, Z. D., Müller, C. L., Miraldi, E. R., Littman, D. R., Blaser, M. J., & Bonneau, R. A. (2015) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004226 · Cited by 1,799
“Examples include a novel statistical regression framework for relating microbiome compositions and covariates in the context of nutrient intake [8], observations that microbiome compositions strongly correlate with disease status in new-onset Crohn’s disease [9], and the connections between helminth infection and the…”
BackgroundDai, Z., Coker, O. O., Nakatsu, G., Wu, W. K. K., Zhao, L., Chen, Z., Chan, F. K. L., Kristiansen, K., Sung, J. J. Y., Wong, S. H., et al. (2018) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-018-0451-2 · Cited by 545
“To evaluate the statistical power of rank sum metaanalysis method, we simulated microbial composition data following Dirichlet-multinomial distribution [46].”
Modeling microbial abundances and dysbiosis with beta-binomial regression
Martin, B. D., Witten, D., & Willis, A. D. (2020) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/19-aoas1283 · Cited by 379
“nd others, 2015; Sankaran and Holmes, 2017). Hierarchical models of absolute abundances are often used to constrain the number of parameters (e.g. La Rosa and others (2012); Holmes and others (2012); Chen and Li (2013); Sankaran and Holmes (2017); Cao and others (2017)). However, modeling the variance structure is cha…”
Network analysis methods for studying microbial communities: A mini review
Matchado, M. S., Lauber, M., Reitmeier, S., Kacprowski, T., Baumbach, J., Haller, D., & List, M. (2021) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2021.05.001 · Cited by 368
“MDiNE addresses compositionality by utilizing a Dirichlet-multinomial logistic-normal distribution model [61,62].”
MethodA phylogenetic transform enhances analysis of compositional microbiota data
Silverman, J. D., Washburne, A., Mukherjee, S., & David, L. A. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21887 · Cited by 321
Microbiome, Metagenomics, and High-Dimensional Compositional Data Analysis
Li, H. (2015) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020351 · Cited by 288
Self-citationVariable selection in regression with compositional covariates
Lin, W. C., Shi, P., Feng, R., & Li, H. (2014) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asu031 · Cited by 241
Self-citationChen, L., Reeve, J., Zhang, L., Huang, S., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.4600 · Cited by 225
“Specifically, we generate zero-inflated count data based on a Dirichlet-multinomial model with known Chen et al. (2018), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.4600 5/20 library sizes (Chen & Li, 2013).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationXia, Y. (2020) · Progress in molecular biology and translational science · doi:10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.04.003 · Cited by 239
DRIMSeq: a Dirichlet-multinomial framework for multivariate count outcomes in genomics
Nowicka, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8900.2 · Cited by 232
Yang, L., & Chen, J. (2022) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-022-01320-0 · Cited by 200
“A semiparametric simulation framework Traditional simulations are usually based on parametric models such as Dirichlet-multinomial model [50, 51] and logistic normal multinomial model [41].”
Self-citationMicrobiome Multi-Omics Network Analysis: Statistical Considerations, Limitations, and Opportunities
Jiang, D., Armour, C. R., Hu, C., Meng, M., Tian, C., Sharpton, T. J., & Jiang, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00995 · Cited by 170
“DCA has been applied to the functional analysis of genes (Cho et al., 2016) and drug-target interaction network (Luo et al., 2017).”
BackgroundInfluentialTang, Z.-Z., Chen, G., Hong, Q., Huang, S., Smith, H., Shah, R. D., Scholz, M. B., & Ferguson, J. F. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00454 · Cited by 175
“Alternative methods that treat microbiome as dependent variables include sparse Dirichlet-Multinomial (DM) method (Chen and Li, 2013) and multivariate zero-inflated logistic-normal method (Li et al.”
MethodA Logistic Normal Multinomial Regression Model for Microbiome Compositional Data Analysis
Xia, F., Chen, J., Fung, W. K., & Li, H. (2013) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12079 · Cited by 144
Self-citationNegative binomial mixed models for analyzing microbiome count data
Zhang, X., Mallick, H., Tang, Z., Zhang, L., Cui, X., Benson, A. K., & Yi, N. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1441-7 · Cited by 160
“Several studies have recently performed simulations for microbiome data [25, 29, 30, 49, 50], most of which use negative binomial dis-”
MethodLongitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma
Björk, J. R., Bolte, L. A., Maltez Thomas, A., Lee, K. A., Rossi, N., Wind, T. T., Smit, L. M., Armanini, F., Asnicar, F., Blanco-Miguez, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-02803-3 · Cited by 156
“While both the multinomial Dirichlet model and the multinomial logistic normal model can handle over-dispersed count data 70,71 , the logistic normal model also allows for both positive and negative covariation between microbial features 69 .”
Zhang, Q., Difford, G. F., Sahana, G., Løvendahl, P., Lassen, J., Lund, M. S., Guldbrandtsen, B., & Janss, L. (2020) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-020-0663-x · Cited by 111
Testing hypotheses about the microbiome using the linear decomposition model (LDM)
Hu, Y., & Satten, G. A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa260 · Cited by 92
“02 obtained from these data, which is also the median value we observed in an admittedly brief survey of the literature (Chen and Li, 2013; La Rosa et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2015).”
MethodDRIMSeq: a Dirichlet-multinomial framework for multivariate count outcomes in genomics
Nowicka, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2016) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.8900.1 · Cited by 95
Latent variable modeling for the microbiome
Sankaran, K., & Holmes, S. (2018) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxy018 · Cited by 92
Tang, Z.-Z., & Chen, G. (2018) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxy025 · Cited by 95
Low nadir CD4+ T-cell counts predict gut dysbiosis in HIV-1 infection
Guillén, Y., Noguera-Julián, M., Rivera, J., Casadellà, M., Zevin, A. S., Rocafort, M., Parera, M., Rodriguez, C., Arumí, M., Carrillo, J., et al. (2018) · Mucosal Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41385-018-0083-7 · Cited by 95
Regression Models for Multivariate Count Data
Zhang, Y., Zhou, H., Zhou, J. J., & Sun, W. (2016) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2016.1154063 · Cited by 87
“For instance, in a sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression model proposed by Chen and Li (2013), βk j being nonzero indicates association of predictor k with bacterial taxon j.”
Machine Intelligence in Single-Cell Data Analysis: Advances and New Challenges
Liu, J., Fan, Z., Zhao, W., & Zhou, X. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.655536 · Cited by 86
“So far, compositional analysis has been an active and ongoing area in metagenomic data (Norouzi-Beirami et al., 2021) and microbiome research (Chen and Li, 2013; Bian et al., 2017; Rivera-Pinto et al., 2018), due to the compositional nature of metagenomic and microbiome data.”
BackgroundInvestigating microbial co-occurrence patterns based on metagenomic compositional data
Ban, Y. J., An, L., & Jiang, H. (2015) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv364 · Cited by 85
Wadsworth, W. D., Argiento, R., Guindani, M., Galloway-Peña, J., Shelburne, S. A., & Vannucci, M. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1516-0 · Cited by 84
“A penalized likelihood approach based on a DM regression model has been proposed instead by [26] to determine significant associations between the microbiome composition and a set of covariates which describe the individual dietary nutrients’ intakes.”
MethodA statistical model for describing and simulating microbial community profiles
Ma, S., Ren, B., Mallick, H., Moon, Y. S., Schwager, E., Maharjan, S., Tickle, T. L., Lu, Y., Carmody, R. N., Franzosa, E. A., et al. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008913 · Cited by 74
“This was quantitatively compared against alternative models (Dirichlet-multinomial, DM [20] and gamma-MGH, namely metaSPARSim [18]) with the PERMANOVA R 2 statistic [25] ( Meth-ods ).”
InfluentialRegularized regression for categorical data
Tutz, G., & Gertheiss, J. (2016) · Statistical Modelling · doi:10.1177/1471082x16642560 · Cited by 66
“Preliminary versions of the group lasso within the multinomial regression framework have been considered by Tutz (2012), Vincent and Hansen (2014), Chen and Li (2013) and Simon et al. (2013).”
MethodTemporal probabilistic modeling of bacterial compositions derived from 16S rRNA sequencing
Äijö, T., Müller, C. L., & Bonneau, R. (2017) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx549 · Cited by 64
“The observed overfitting, especially among lowly abundant orders, is not surprising since LOWESS and ML estimation do not take into account the statistical nature of count data.”
MethodInfluentialPredictive Modeling of Microbiome Data Using a Phylogeny-Regularized Generalized Linear Mixed Model
Xiao, J. Y., Chen, L., Johnson, S. P., Yu, Y., Zhang, X., & Chen, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01391 · Cited by 58
“Simulating OTU Abundance Data We generated the OTU counts using a Dirichlet-multinomial distribution with the parameters (the mean proportion vector and the dispersion parameter φ) estimated based on a real OTU dataset from a study of the microbiome of the human upper respiratory tract (Charlson et al., 2010; Chen and…”
MethodSelf-citationHarrison, J. G., Calder, W. J., Shastry, V., & Buerkle, C. A. (2019) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.13128 · Cited by 55
Laue, H. E., Moroishi, Y., Jackson, B. P., Palys, T. J., Madan, J. C., & Karagas, M. R. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2020.105613 · Cited by 58
“5 was added to zero-count data before calculating relative abundance and log transformation (Chen and Li, 2013).”
MethodWang, T., & Zhao, H. (2017) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12654 · Cited by 57
“To make feasible the comparison of ROC curves between our method and that of Chen and Li (2013), we can calculate the true positive rate and false positive rate in terms of how each method identifies the relevant covariates.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialscDC: single cell differential composition analysis
Cao, Y., Lin, Y., Ormerod, J. T., Yang, P., Yang, J. Y. H., & Lo, K. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-3211-9 · Cited by 55
A Survey of Statistical Methods for Microbiome Data Analysis
Lutz, K. C., Jiang, S., Neugent, M. L., Nisco, N. J. D., Zhan, X., & Li, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics · doi:10.3389/fams.2022.884810 · Cited by 64
“Multiple testing results in a loss of power in a high-dimensional setting and so regularization would help to increase the power [67].”
InfluentialNeves, A. L. A., Li, F., Ghoshal, B., McAllister, T. A., & Guan, L. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02445 · Cited by 54
“For comparisons between H-FCR and L-FCR groups, we investigated only bacterial and archaeal profiles with a relative abundance > 0.1% prevalent in at least three samples (3 out 6) to avoid sparsely observed counts, which tend to introduce noise in the analysis (Chen and Li, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDohlman, A. B., & Shen, X. (2019) · Experimental Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1177/1535370219836771 · Cited by 54
To rarefy or not to rarefy: robustness and efficiency trade-offs of rarefying microbiome data
Hong, J., Karaöz, U., de Valpine, P., & Fithian, W. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btac127 · Cited by 57
MDiNE : a model to estimate differential co-occurrence networks in microbiome studies
McGregor, K., Labbe, A., & Greenwood, C. M. T. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz824 · Cited by 53
Martin, I., Djuardi, Y., Sartono, E., Rosa, B. A., Supali, T., Mitreva, M., Houwing‐Duistermaat, J. J., & Yazdanbakhsh, M. (2018) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0006620 · Cited by 54
A general framework for association analysis of microbial communities on a taxonomic tree
Tang, Z.-Z., Chen, G., Alekseyenko, A. V., & Li, H. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw804 · Cited by 47
“The second type directly models the compositional taxa counts using Dirichletmultinomial (DM) distribution (Chen and Li, 2013; La Rosa et al., 2012).”
MethodSelf-citationBatch effects correction for microbiome data with Dirichlet-multinomial regression
Dai, Z., Wong, S. H., Yu, J. Q., & Wei, Y. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty729 · Cited by 44
Statistical analysis of microbiome data: The challenge of sparsity
Pan, A. (2021) · Current Opinion in Endocrine and Metabolic Research · doi:10.1016/j.coemr.2021.05.005 · Cited by 49
Variable selection in general multinomial logit models
Tutz, G., Pößnecker, W., & Uhlmann, L. (2014) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2014.09.009 · Cited by 47
Power and sample size calculations for high-throughput sequencing-based experiments
Li, C.-I., Samuels, D. C., Zhao, Y., Shyr, Y., & Guo, Y. P. (2017) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx061 · Cited by 46
Yang, Y., Chen, N., & Chen, T. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2016.12.012 · Cited by 48
MIMIX: A Bayesian Mixed-Effects Model for Microbiome Data From Designed Experiments
Grantham, N. S., Guan, Y., Reich, B. J., Borer, E. T., & Gross, K. (2019) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2019.1626242 · Cited by 42
“…example, the DM has proven useful for microbiome analysis in the areas of hypothesis testing and power calculations (La Rosa et al. 2012), sparse variable selection (Chen and Li 2013), inference of microbial community structure (Shafiei et al. 2015), and regression modeling (Wadsworth et al. 2017).”
MethodJiang, S., Xiao, G., Koh, A. Y., Kim, J., Li, Q., & Zhan, X. (2019) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxz050 · Cited by 42
“Other model-based methods (Chen and Li, 2013; Wadsworth and others , 2017) have been proposed to detect covariate-taxa associations, but the taxon-outcome associations haven been ignored from these models.”
MethodBenchmarking differential abundance analysis methods for correlated microbiome sequencing data
Yang, L., & Chen, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac607 · Cited by 40
Self-citationCompositional knockoff filter for high‐dimensional regression analysis of microbiome data
Srinivasan, A., Xue, L., & Zhan, X. (2020) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13336 · Cited by 40
“On the other hand, a joint microbiome selection approach usually models all taxa collectively using penalized regression (Chen and Li, 2013; Lin et al., 2014).”
BackgroundmetaSPARSim: a 16S rRNA gene sequencing count data simulator
Patuzzi, I., Baruzzo, G., Losasso, C., Ricci, A., & Camillo, B. D. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2882-6 · Cited by 42
A GLM-based Latent Variable Ordination Method for Microbiome Samples
Sohn, M. B., & Li, H. (2017) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12775 · Cited by 38
“However, they are not suitable for microbiome data in which apparent overdispersion has been evidenced (Chen and Li, 2013; McMurdie and Holmes, 2014).”
Self-citationHome dust microbiota is disordered in homes of low-income asthmatic children
Ciaccio, C. E., Barnes, C. S., Kennedy, K., Chan, M. A., Portnoy, J. M., & Rosenwasser, L. J. (2015) · Journal of Asthma · doi:10.3109/02770903.2015.1028076 · Cited by 36
“Regression models for 16 s sequencing have recently been developed and will allow for analysis of the multiple covariates in future studies [18,19].”
MethodLee, K. H., Coull, B. A., Moscicki, A., Paster, B. J., & Starr, J. R. (2018) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxy067 · Cited by 34
“One approach for joint modeling of multivariate microbial sequence count data is Dirichlet-multinomial regression (Holmes et al., 2012; La Rosa et al., 2012; Chen and Li, 2013; Wadsworth et al., 2017).”
MethodDeek, R. A., Ma, S., Lewis, J., & Li, H. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.88956 · Cited by 35
Self-citationLi, Z., Lee, K., Karagas, M. R., Madan, J. C., Hoen, A. G., O’Malley, A. J., & Li, H. (2018) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-018-9219-2 · Cited by 32
Self-citationA permutation-based non-parametric analysis of CRISPR screen data
Jia, G., Wang, X., & Xiao, G. (2017) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3938-5 · Cited by 32
“After combining the multinomial model with the Dirichlet model, the mixture model is a Dirichlet-multinomial model with the probability mass function (PMF) shown below: [23, 25].”
BackgroundMethodMIDASim: a fast and simple simulator for realistic microbiome data
He, M., Zhao, N., & Satten, G. A. (2024) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-024-01822-z · Cited by 29
“Another method, MetaSPARSim [18], uses a gamma-multivariate hypergeometric (gamma-68 MHG) model, in which the gamma distribution models the biological variability of taxa counts, accounting for overdispersion, and the MHG distribution models technical variability originating from the sequencing…”
MethodPredictive analysis methods for human microbiome data with application to Parkinson’s disease
Dong, M., Li, L., Chen, M., KUSALIK, A. J., & Xu, W. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237779 · Cited by 29
“The uniform distribution is a commonly used distribution to generate total reads [6].”
BackgroundMethodGut microbiota in Malawian infants in a nutritional supplementation trial
Cheung, Y. B., Xu, Y., Mangani, C., Fan, Y., Dewey, K. G., Salminen, S., Maleta, K. M., & Ashorn, P. (2015) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.12650 · Cited by 29
“The overall profile of the distribution of species and genera at 6 and at 18 months across the four randomised groups was tested with the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution for the normalised multivariate count data without log-transformation [24, 25], using the R package HMP.”
MethodNonsparse Learning with Latent Variables
Zheng, Z., Lv, J., & Lin, W. C. (2020) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.2020.2005 · Cited by 28
“We illustrate the usefulness of our proposed methodology by applying it to the data set reported by Wu et al. (2011) and previously studied by Chen and Li (2013) and Lin et al. (2014), where a cross-sectional study of 98 healthy volunteers was carried out to investigate the habitual diet effect on…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA phylogenetic scan test on a Dirichlet-tree multinomial model for microbiome data
Tang, Y., Ma, L., & Nicolae, D. L. (2018) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/17-aoas1086 · Cited by 27
“The grouping operation based on taxonomy is a common practice in recent papers including La Rosa et al. (2012) and Chen and Li (2013).”
MethodLi, Q., Guindani, M., Reich, B. J., Bondell, H. D., & Vannucci, M. (2017) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11350 · Cited by 26
“In biology, sequence data—for example, SAGE data, RNA-Seq and microbiome data [8, 17, 40]—are represented as a matrix of short sequence tags (eg taxonomic units in a microbiome experiment) and corresponding observed reads for several samples.”
BackgroundLovell, D. R., Chua, X., & McGrath, A. (2020) · NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa040 · Cited by 27
Kernel Methods for Regression Analysis of Microbiome Compositional Data
Chen, J., & Li, H. (2013) · Springer proceedings in mathematics & statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7846-1_16 · Cited by 25
“We model the OTU counts using Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) model to account for the overdispersion seen in real microbiome data [11].”
MethodSelf-citationAn empirical Bayes approach to normalization and differential abundance testing for microbiome data
Liu, T., Zhao, H., & Wang, T. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03552-z · Cited by 28
“To account for the excess variation, the Dirichlet-multinomial (DM) distribution is commonly used in practice [27, 28].”
BackgroundMethodKoslovsky, M. D., Hoffman, K. L., Daniel, C. R., & Vannucci, M. (2020) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/20-aoas1354 · Cited by 24
“crobial count data, researchers have previously used Dirichlet-multinomial models, since these models can handle overdispersed data that arise from within- and between-subject variability in microbial data (La Rosa et al., 2012; Chen and Li, 2013; Wadsworth et al., 2017).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialPeterson, C. B., Saha, S., & Do, K.-A. (2023) · Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application · doi:10.1146/annurev-statistics-040522-120734 · Cited by 29
Latent Network Estimation and Variable Selection for Compositional Data Via Variational EM
Osborne, N., Peterson, C. B., & Vannucci, M. (2021) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2021.1935971 · Cited by 24
“For these reasons, Dirichlet-Multinomial distributions are particularly appropriate to model microbiome data, as demonstrated by several authors (Chen and Li, 2013; Tang et al., 2018; Wadsworth et al., 2017).”
MethodBayesian biclustering for microbial metagenomic sequencing data via multinomial matrix factorization
Zhou, F., He, K., Li, Q., Chapkin, R. S., & Ni, Y. (2021) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxab002 · Cited by 23
“When treating compositional data as response, a sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression model was employed in Chen and Li (2013) to associate microbiome composition with environmental covariates.”
MethodKoslovsky, M. D. (2023) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13853 · Cited by 25
“Here, the exponentiation of a regression coefficient is interpreted as the multiplicative factor of change in the proportion of a compositional element with a one unit change in the corresponding standardized covariate while holding all else constant (Chen and Li, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialApplications of weighted association networks applied to compositional data in biology
Espinoza, J. L., Shah, N., Singh, S., Nelson, K. E., & Dupont, C. L. (2020) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15091 · Cited by 22
“…amplicons are compositional, sparse, and have complex distributions such as negative binomial (Robinson et al. , 2010; Love et al. , 2014), zero-inflated gaussian (Paulson et al. , 2013), and Dirichlet (Holmes et al. , 2012; Chen and Li, 2013; Wadsworth et al. , 2017; Harrison et al. , 2019).”
BackgroundChen, B., & Xu, W. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008108 · Cited by 22
“[17] proposed an approach which assumes that multiple OTUs follow Dirichlet multinomial (DM) distribution.”
BackgroundCluster Analysis of Microbiome Data by Using Mixtures of Dirichlet–Multinomial Regression Models
Subedi, S. D., Neish, D., Bak, S., & Feng, Z. Z. (2020) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · doi:10.1111/rssc.12432 · Cited by 20
A Model for Paired-Multinomial Data and Its Application to Analysis of Data on a Taxonomic Tree
Shi, P., & Li, H. (2017) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.12681 · Cited by 18
“An alternative test is based on the Dirichlet multinomial (DM) distribution to model the counts of sequence reads from microbiome samples (La Rosa et al., 2012; Chen and Li, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationtascCODA: Bayesian Tree-Aggregated Analysis of Compositional Amplicon and Single-Cell Data
Ostner, J., Carcy, S., & Müller, C. L. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.766405 · Cited by 19
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Chen, J., & Chen, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.749573 · Cited by 18
“Instead of using a parametrical model such as the Dirichlet-multinomial model (Chen and Li, 2013), the microbiome data were directly resampled from a large gut microbiome study by Hale et al. (2017).”
MethodSelf-citationHypothesis Testing of Metagenomic Data
Rosa, P. S. L., Zhou, Y., Sodergren, E. J., et al. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-410472-3.00006-3 · Cited by 18
Shankar, J., Szpakowski, S., Solis, N. V., Mounaud, S. H., Liu, H., Losada, L. C., Nierman, W. C., & Filler, S. G. (2015) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0467-6 · Cited by 18
“A limitation of our approach, which is shared by other analytical approaches such as [4,16,17], is the assumption that taxonomic assignment for all organisms at all phylogenetic levels is equally accurate.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe mixed model for the analysis of a repeated‐measurement multivariate count data
Martin, I., Uh, H., Supali, T., et al. (2019) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8101 · Cited by 18
“It is shown in Appendix A that, in the case where the total count does not depend on the random effect ui, the likelihoods (10) and (12) are equivalent.”
BackgroundA systematic benchmark of integrative strategies for microbiome-metabolome data
Mangnier, L., Bodein, A., Mariaz, M., Mathieu, A., Scott‐Boyer, M., Vashist, N., Bramble, M. S., & Droit, A. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-08515-9 · Cited by 20
“Indeed, in some contexts, linking metabolome to microbiome using models such as the Dirichlet regression could be achieved 36,37 .”
Clustering on Human Microbiome Sequencing Data: A Distance-Based Unsupervised Learning Model
Yang, D., & Xu, W. (2020) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms8101612 · Cited by 19
“Extensions such as the Sparse Dirichlet-multinomial regression technique [25] and finite mixtures of the Dirichlet-multinomial model [26,27] have been proposed to improve on different statistical aspects.”
MethodClustering microbiome data using mixtures of logistic normal multinomial models
Fang, Y., & Subedi, S. D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41318-8 · Cited by 17
“el (Zhang et al., 2017), zero-in ated negative binomial model (Zhang and Yi, 2020), zero-in ated Poisson model(Joseph et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2020), Dirichlet-multinomial model (Holmes et al., 2012; Chen and Li, 2013; Subedi et al., 2020), and the logistic normal multinomial model(Xia et al., 2013). While modelling s…”
Bayesian Graphical Compositional Regression for Microbiome Data
Mao, J., Chen, Y., & Ma, L. (2019) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2019.1647212 · Cited by 16
“One simple attempt to alleviate this problem is to aggregate OTUs from the same genus and study their composition at the genus level as suggested by Chen and Li (2013).”
BackgroundBayesian mixed effects models for zero-inflated compositions in microbiome data analysis
Ren, B., Bacallado, S., Favaro, S., et al. (2020) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/19-aoas1295 · Cited by 15
“The outlined limitation has prompted the introduction of joint models of microbial abundance (Chen and Li, 2013; Xia et al., 2013; Wadsworth et al., 2017; Grantham et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCombining p-values from various statistical methods for microbiome data
Ham, H., & Park, T. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.990870 · Cited by 14
“Microbiome datasets were simulated according to Chen and Li’s approach (Chen and Li, 2013).”
MethodStatistical Data Analysis of Microbiomes and Metabolomics
Xia, Y., & Sun, J. (2021) · ACS in focus · doi:10.1021/acsinfocus.7e5035 · Cited by 15
Ascari, R., & Migliorati, S. (2021) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9005 · Cited by 14
Scalable Estimation and Regularization for the Logistic Normal Multinomial Model
Zhang, J., & Lin, W. C. (2019) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/biom.13071 · Cited by 14
“In particular, the Dirichlet-multinomial model (Mosimann, 1962; Chen and Li, 2013), which imposes a Dirichlet distribution on the taxa composition, is computationally simple but entails correlation structures among the taxa that are too restrictive to be satisfied in practice.”
MethodKoslovsky, M. D., & Vannucci, M. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03640-0 · Cited by 14
Shi, P., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, A. R. (2021) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/asab020 · Cited by 14
“By treating Zij as the true compositions, it is also overlooking the heteroskedasticity or overdispersion of Zij caused by enormous uncontrollable factors of variation in sequencing, e.g., time, sampling location, or technical variability (Chen and Li, 2013).”
BackgroundThe power and pitfalls of Dirichlet-multinomial mixture models for ecological count dataPreprint
O’Brien, J. D., Record, N. R., & Countway, P. D. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/045468 · Cited by 13
Xu, L., Paterson, A. D., & Xu, W. (2017) · Genetic Epidemiology · doi:10.1002/gepi.22031 · Cited by 13
“To allow for overdispersion, Dirichlet multinomial (DM) regression (Chen & Li, 2013) and logistic normal multinomial regression (Xia, Chen, Fung, & Li, 2013) were proposed for modeling microbiome data.”
MethodWu, Q., O’Malley, A. J., Datta, S., Gharaibeh, R. Z., Jobin, C., Karagas, M. R., Coker, M. O., Hoen, A. G., Christensen, B. C., Madan, J. C., et al. (2022) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes13061049 · Cited by 18
Introductory Overview of Statistical Analysis of Microbiome Data
Xia, Y., Sun, J., & Chen, D. (2018) · ICSA book series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-1534-3_3 · Cited by 14
Sun, H. L., Huang, X., Huo, B., Tan, Y., He, T., & Jiang, X. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac149 · Cited by 12
Group Penalized Multinomial Logit Models and Stock Return Direction Prediction
Hu, X., & Yang, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2024.3376751 · Cited by 12
“Few group penalized approaches have been developed for MLM except for a few work by [8], [36], and [43].”
MethodLynch, M. L., Dudek, M. F., & Bowman, S. E. J. (2020) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100024 · Cited by 12
“We select a log-linear regression model of the Dirichlet multinomial (DMN) count profiles on PEG MW as continuous, nonzero predictor.(32,33) The DMN distribution has been proposed as an extension to the multinomial for estimating proportions arising from count data in multiple categories, providing better handling of…”
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., & Li, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- The Annals of Applied Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 418-442
- ISSN
- 1932-6157 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-7330
- PMC
- PMC3846354
- OpenAlex
- W2124053577
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- The Annals of Applied Statistics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01 CA127334)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097505)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (UH2 DK083981)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- feature selection, microbiota composition, overdispersion, high-dimensional regression, block coordinate descent, nutrient intake, gut microbiota, multiple comparisons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review