The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation
Open accessAbstract
Folded concave penalization methods have been shown to enjoy the strong oracle property for high-dimensional sparse estimation. However, a folded concave penalization problem usually has multiple local solutions and the oracle property is established only for one of the unknown local solutions. A challenging fundamental issue still remains that it is not clear whether the local optimum computed by a given optimization algorithm possesses those nice theoretical properties. To close this important theoretical gap in over a decade, we provide a unified theory to show explicitly how to obtain the oracle solution via the local linear approximation algorithm. For a folded concave penalized estimation problem, we show that as long as the problem is localizable and the oracle estimator is well behaved, we can obtain the oracle estimator by using the one-step local linear approximation. In addition, once the oracle estimator is obtained, the local linear approximation algorithm converges, namely it produces the same estimator in the next iteration. The general theory is demonstrated by using four classical sparse estimation problems, i.e., sparse linear regression, sparse logistic regression, sparse precision matrix estimation and sparse quantile regression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913643 · Cited by 13,316
Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., & Tibshirani, R. (2004) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/009053604000000067 · Cited by 9,357
Variable Selection via Nonconcave Penalized Likelihood and its Oracle Properties
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2001) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214501753382273 · Cited by 8,900
Self-citationThe adaptive lasso and its oracle properties
Zou, H. (2006) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000000735 · Cited by 7,470
Self-citationSparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2008) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045 · Cited by 6,355
Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ 1 Minimization
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B., & Boyd, S. P. (2008) · Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x · Cited by 4,863
Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty
Zhang, C.-H. (2010) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/09-aos729 · Cited by 3,835
High dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso
Meinshausen, N., & Bühlmann, P. (2006) · Cited by 2,539
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2014-06-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 819-849
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129554161
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 29.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/13-aos1198
- The paper
- Fan, J., Xue, L., & Zou, H. (2014). Strong oracle optimality of folded concave penalized estimation. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/13-aos1198
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.