The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle
Open accessAbstract
A statistical functional, such as the mean or the median, is called elicitable if there is a scoring function or loss function such that the correct forecast of the functional is the unique minimizer of the expected score. Such scoring functions are called strictly consistent for the functional. The elicitability of a functional opens the possibility to compare competing forecasts and to rank them in terms of their realized scores. In this paper, we explore the notion of elicitability for multi-dimensional functionals and give both necessary and sufficient conditions for strictly consistent scoring functions. We cover the case of functionals with elicitable components, but we also show that one-dimensional functionals that are not elicitable can be a component of a higher order elicitable functional. In the case of the variance, this is a known result. However, an important result of this paper is that spectral risk measures with a spectral measure with finite support are jointly elicitable if one adds the “correct” quantiles. A direct consequence of applied interest is that the pair (Value at Risk, Expected Shortfall) is jointly elicitable under mild conditions that are usually fulfilled in risk management applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J., & Heath, D. (1999) · Mathematical Finance · doi:10.1111/1467-9965.00068 · Cited by 8,806
Robust estimation of a location parameter
Huber, P. J. (1964) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177703732 · Cited by 7,228
Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/016214506000001437 · Cited by 5,793
Koenker, R. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511754098 · Cited by 4,551
Elicitation of Personal Probabilities and Expectations
Savage, L. J. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482346 · Cited by 1,226
Making and Evaluating Point Forecasts
Gneiting, T. (2011) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2011.r10138 · Cited by 1,154
Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing
Newey, W. K., & Powell, J. L. (1987) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911031 · Cited by 1,048
Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures
Cont, R., Deguest, R., & Scandolo, G. (2010) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697681003685597 · Cited by 416
On the Optimality of Conditional Expectation as a Bregman Predictor
Banerjee, A., Guo, X., & Wang, H. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2005.850145 · Cited by 240
Bellini, F., & Bignozzi, V. (2015) · Quantitative Finance · doi:10.1080/14697688.2014.946955 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- Fissler, T., & Ziegel, J. F.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1680-1707
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3101267821
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 36.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/16-aos1439
- The paper
- Fissler, T., & Ziegel, J. F. (2016). Higher order elicitability and Osband’s principle. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-aos1439
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.