Cited by 146Advanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchOptimization and Search ProblemsGame Theory and Applications

A Short Proof of the Gittins Index Theorem

Open access
Tsitsiklis, John N.·1994·The Annals of Applied Probability

Abstract

We provide a short and elementary proof of the Gittins index theorem for the multi-armed bandit problem, for the case where each bandit is modeled as a finite-state semi-Markov process. We also indicate how this proof can be extended to the branching bandits and Klimov problems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aoap/1177005207

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exploration should be minimized to perform optimally in this task because stationary distributions were used and it is a 2-armed bandit task.

    “Although it could be argued that participants should explore in this task and therefore that referencing choices to an ideal observer is not optimal, exploration should be minimized to perform optimally, as we used stationary distributions and therefore this is a 2-armed bandit task (Tsitsiklis, 1994).”

    From Oxytocin decreases aversion to angry faces in an associative learning task (2010) · cites this paper as Tsitsiklis, 1994

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2][2] GITTINs, J. C. (1989). Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices. Wiley, New York. -
  2. [3][3] GITTINS, J. C. and JoNEs, D. M. (1974). A dynamic allocation index for the design of experiments. In Progress in Statistics (J. Gani, K. Sarkadi and I. Vince, eds.) Colloq. Math. Soc. János Bolyai 9. North-Holland, Amsterdam. -
  3. [7][7] TsITsIKLIs, J. N. (1986). A lemma on the multi-armed bandit problem. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 31 576–577. -
  4. [9][9] VARAIYA, P., WALRAND, J. and BUYUKKOC, C. (1985). Extensions of the multi-armed bandit problem: The discounted case. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-30 426-439. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsitsiklis, J. N.
Corresponding author
Tsitsiklis, John N.
Venue
The Annals of Applied Probability
Published
1994-02-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
194-199
ISSN
  • 1050-5164 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8737
OpenAlex
W2159471113
Cited by
143
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Applied Probability (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Optimization and Search Problems
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
multi-armed bandits, optimal stopping, sequential decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review