The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneous Confidence Interval Estimation
Open accessAbstract
The work of Neyman on confidence limits and of Fisher on fiducial limits is well known. However, in most applications the interval or limits for only a single parameter or a single function of the parameters has been considered. Recently Scheffe [2] and Tukey [3] have considered special cases of what may be called problems of simultaneous estimation, in which one is interested in giving confidence intervals for a finite or infinite set of parametric functions such that the probability of the parametric functions of the set being simultaneously covered by the corresponding intervals is a preassigned number $1 - \alpha(0 < \alpha < 1).$ In this paper we discuss in Section 1, a set of sufficient conditions under which such simultaneous estimation is possible, and bring out the connection of this with a method of test construction considered by one of the authors in a previous paper [1]. In Section 2 some univariate examples (including the ones due to Scheffe and Tukey) are considered from this point of view. Sections 3 to 6 are concerned with multivariate applications, giving results which are believed to be new. The associated tests all turn out to be the same as in [1] except for the example in Section 4.3 which, in a sense, is a multivariate generalization of Tukey's example (Section 2.2). Section 3 gives the notation and preliminaries for multivariate applications. Section 4 gives confidence bounds on linear functions of means for multivariate normal populations. Sections 5 and 6 give respectively confidence bounds on certain functions of the elements of population covariance matrices and population canonical regressions, from which a chain of simpler consequences would follow by the application of a set of matrix theorems. This has been partly indicated in the present paper and will be more fully discussed in a later paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multiple Range and Multiple F Tests
Duncan, D. B. (1955) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/3001478 · Cited by 23,217
(2004) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b98963 · Cited by 517
Conventional vs. Worker-Owned Organizations
Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M. (1981) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678103401201 · Cited by 223
A robust principal component analysis
Ruymgaart, F. H. (1981) · Journal of Multivariate Analysis · doi:10.1016/0047-259x(81)90091-9 · Cited by 48
Design and Analysis of Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Investigations
Greenhoot, A. F. (2003) · Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470756980.ch6 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, S. N., & Bose, R. C.
- Venue
- The Annals of Mathematical Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1953-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-536
- ISSN
- 0003-4851 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025918513
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous Confidence Interval Estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aoms/1177728912
- The paper
- Roy, S. N., & Bose, R. C. (1953). Simultaneous Confidence Interval Estimation. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728912
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.