The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Variable Selection for Cox's proportional Hazards Model and Frailty Model
Open accessAbstract
A class of variable selection procedures for parametric models via nonconcave penalized likelihood was proposed in Fan and Li (2001a). It has been shown there that the resulting procedures perform as well as if the subset of significant variables were known in advance. Such a property is called an oracle property. The proposed procedures were illustrated in the context of linear regression, robust linear regression and generalized linear models. In this paper, the nonconcave penalized likelihood approach is extended further to the Cox proportional hazards model and the Cox proportional hazards frailty model, two commonly used semi-parametric models in survival analysis. As a result, new variable selection procedures for these two commonly-used models are proposed. It is demonstrated how the rates of convergence depend on the regularization parameter in the penalty function. Further, with a proper choice of the regularization parameter and the penalty function, the proposed estimators possess an oracle property. Standard error formulae are derived and their accuracies are empirically tested. Simulation studies show that the proposed procedures are more stable in prediction and more effective in computation than the best subset variable selection, and they reduce model complexity as effectively as the best subset variable selection. Compared with the LASSO, which is the penalized likelihood method with the $L_1$ -penalty, proposed by Tibshirani, the newly proposed approaches have better theoretic properties and finite sample performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study
Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1176345976 · Cited by 4,419
Craven, P., & Wahba, G. (1978) · Numerische Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf01404567 · Cited by 3,388
Murphy, S. A., & Van Der Vaart, A. W. (2000) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10474219 · Cited by 712
Cited by
Sure Independence Screening for Ultrahigh Dimensional Feature Space
Fan, J., & Lv, J. (2008) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x · Cited by 2,711
Self-citationStatistical challenges with high dimensionality: feature selection in knowledge discovery
Fan, J., & Li, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians Madrid, August 22–30, 2006 · doi:10.4171/022-3/31 · Cited by 348
Self-citationRegression coefficient and autoregressive order shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Wang, H., Li, G., & Tsai, C.-L. (2007) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00577.x · Cited by 304
A General Framework for Updating Belief Distributions
Bissiri, P. G., Holmes, C. C., & Walker, S. G. (2016) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/rssb.12158 · Cited by 285
Determinants of Mobile Apps' Success: Evidence from the App Store Market
Lee, G., & Raghu, T. S. (2014) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222310206 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, J., & Li, R.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-99
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106161928
- Cited by
- 602
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Variable Selection for Cox's proportional Hazards Model and Frailty Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1015362185
- The paper
- Fan, J., & Li, R. (2002). Variable Selection for Cox's proportional Hazards Model and Frailty Model. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1015362185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.