The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model selection
Open accessAbstract
We consider the problem of estimating $\|s\|^2$ when $s$ belongs to some separable Hilbert space and one observes the Gaussian process $Y(t) = \langles, t\rangle + \sigmaL(t)$, for all $t \epsilon \mathbb{H}$,where $L$ is some Gaussian isonormal process. This framework allows us in particular to consider the classical “Gaussian sequence model” for which $\mathbb{H} = l_2(\mathbb{N}*)$ and $L(t) = \sum_{\lambda\geq1}t_{\lambda}\varepsilon_{\lambda}$, where $(\varepsilon_{\lambda})_{\lambda\geq1}$ is a sequence of i.i.d. standard normal variables. Our approach consists in considering some at most countable families of finite-dimensional linear subspaces of $\mathbb{H}$ (the models) and then using model selection via some conveniently penalized least squares criterion to build new estimators of $\|s\|^2$. We prove a general nonasymptotic risk bound which allows us to show that such penalized estimators are adaptive on a variety of collections of sets for the parameter $s$, depending on the family of models from which they are built.In particular, in the context of the Gaussian sequence model, a convenient choice of the family of models allows defining estimators which are adaptive over collections of hyperrectangles, ellipsoids, $l_p$-bodies or Besov bodies.We take special care to describe the conditions under which the penalized estimator is efficient when the level of noise $\sigma$ tends to zero. Our construction is an alternative to the one by Efroïmovich and Low for hyperrectangles and provides new results otherwise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exact Matrix Completion via Convex Optimization
Candès, E. J., & Recht, B. (2009) · Foundations of Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10208-009-9045-5 · Cited by 4,877
Wainwright, M. J. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2009.2016018 · Cited by 1,198
Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features
Ilyas, A., Santurkar, S., Tsipras, D., Engstrom, L., Tran, B., & Madry, A. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.02175 · Cited by 971
Computational Advertising: Techniques for Targeting Relevant Ads
Woodruff, D. P. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000060 · Cited by 866
Scornet, E., Biau, G., & Vert, J.-P. (2015) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/15-aos1321 · Cited by 612
Metadata
- Authors
- Laurent, B., & Massart, P.
- Venue
- The Annals of Statistics
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1302-1338
- ISSN
- 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1560153690
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/aos/1015957395
- The paper
- Laurent, B., & Massart, P. (2000). Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model selection. The Annals of Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1015957395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.