Cited by 23Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and InferenceProbability and Statistical Research

Bias-Variance Tradeoffs in Functional Estimation Problems

Open access
Low, Mark G.·1995·The Annals of Statistics

Abstract

It is shown in infinite-dimensional Gaussian problems that affine estimators minimax the variance among all estimators of a linear functional subject to a constraint on the bias. Likewise, affine estimators also minimax the square of the bias among all estimates of a linear functional subject to a constraint on the variance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/aos/1176324624

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When Θ is convex, the minimization to construct the optimal FLCI can be solved as a nested optimization problem, where both the inner and outer minimizations are convex.

    “When is convex, this minimization can be solved as a nested optimization problem, where both the inner and outer minimizations are convex (Low, 1995;Armstrong andKolesár, 2018, 2020a).”

    From A More Credible Approach to Parallel Trends (2023) · cites this paper as Low, 1995

    The discussion on p. 2 describes finding a hardest one-dimensional subfamily and then finding optimal affine estimators over it; it also discusses fixed-length confidence intervals. But neither that passage nor Theorem 2 (p. 6) says that constructing an optimal FLCI is a nested optimization with both minimizations convex. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Low, M. G.
Corresponding author
Low, Mark G.
Venue
The Annals of Statistics
Published
1995-06-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
824-835
ISSN
  • 0090-5364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8966
OpenAlex
W2028000850
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
bias-variance trade-off, functional estimation, linear functionals, minimax estimation, constrained estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review