The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bayesian Analysis in Expert Systems
Open accessAbstract
We review recent developments in applying Bayesian probabilistic and statistical ideas to expert systems. Using a real, moderately complex, medical example we illustrate how qualitative and quantitative knowledge can be represented within a directed graphical model, generally known as a belief network in this context. Exact probabilistic inference on individual cases is possible using a general propagation procedure. When data on a series of cases are available, Bayesian statistical techniques can be used for updating the original subjective quantitative inputs, and we present a set of diagnostics for identifying conflicts between the data and the prior specification. A model comparison procedure is explored, and a number of links made with mainstream statistical methods. Details are given on the use of Dirichlet prior distributions for learning about parameters and the process of transforming the original graphical model to a junction tree as the basis for efficient computation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
Two Further Applications of a Model for Binary Regression
Cox, D. R. (1958) · Biometrika · doi:10.2307/2333203 · Cited by 557
Cited by
Friedman, N., Geiger, D., & Goldszmidt, M. (1997) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007465528199 · Cited by 4,742
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Causal diagrams for empirical research
PEARL, J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.669 · Cited by 2,355
Machine learning for medical diagnosis: history, state of the art and perspective
Kononenko, I. (2001) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0933-3657(01)00077-x · Cited by 1,306
Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling
Uusitalo, L. (2007) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.033 · Cited by 1,118
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiegelhalter, D. J., Dawid, A. P., Lauritzen, S. L., & Cowell, R. G.
- Venue
- Statistical Science
- Publisher
- Institute of Mathematical Statistics
- Published
- 1993-08-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069469807
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bayesian Analysis in Expert Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1214/ss/1177010888
- The paper
- Spiegelhalter, D. J., Dawid, A. P., Lauritzen, S. L., & Cowell, R. G. (1993). Bayesian Analysis in Expert Systems. Statistical Science. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177010888
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.