Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

On the Riemannian Penrose inequality in dimensions less than eight

Bray, Hubert L., Lee, Dan A.·2009·Duke Mathematical Journal

Abstract

The positive mass theorem states that a complete asymptotically flat manifold of nonnegative scalar curvature has nonnegative mass and that equality is achieved only for the Euclidean metric. The Riemannian Penrose inequality provides a sharp lower bound for the mass when black holes are present. More precisely, this lower bound is given in terms of the area of an outermost minimal hypersurface, and equality is achieved only for Schwarzschild metrics. The Riemannian Penrose inequality was first proved in three dimensions in 1997 by G. Huisken and T. Ilmanen for the case of a single black hole (see [HI]). In 1999, Bray extended this result to the general case of multiple black holes using a different technique (see [Br]). In this article, we extend the technique of [Br] to dimensions less than eight. Part of the argument is contained in a companion article by Lee [L]. The equality case of the theorem requires the added assumption that the manifold be spin

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00127094-2009-020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The classical Penrose inequality bounds the total mass M of a D ≥ 4 asymptotically flat or AdS spacetime with a marginally trapped surface σ below by the area A[σ] as in Eq. (7.11).

    “Loosely speaking, assuming there are no naked singularities and collapsing matter settles to a Kerr black hole, then the total mass M for a D ≥ 4-dimensional asymptotically flat [305][306][307][308] or AdS spacetime [309,310] with a marginally trapped surface σ is bounded below by the area A[σ]”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [307]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. R. Schoen and S. T. Yau, On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity, Comm. Math. Phys. 65 (1979), 45--76. · DOI
  2. G. Huisken and T. Ilmanen, The inverse mean curvature flow and the Riemannian Penrose inequality, J. Differential Geom. 59 (2001), 353--437. · DOI · Paper page
  3. W. K. Allard, On the first variation of a varifold, Ann. of Math. (2) 95 (1972), 417--491. · DOI
  4. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, Coordinate invariance and energy expressions in general relativity, Phys. Rev. (2) 122 (1961), 997--1006. · DOI
  5. F. Almgren, Optimal isoperimetric inequalities, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 35 (1986), 451--547. · DOI
  6. R. Bartnik, The mass of an asymptotically flat manifold, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 39 (1986), 661--693. · DOI
  7. H. L. Bray, Proof of the Riemannian Penrose inequality using the positive mass theorem, J. Differential Geom. 59 (2001), 177--267. · DOI · Paper page
  8. H. L. Bray and K. Iga, Superharmonic functions in $\mathbfR\sp n$ and the Penrose inequality in general relativity, Comm. Anal. Geom. 10 (2002), 999--1016. · DOI
  9. D. A. Lee, On the near-equality case of the positive mass theorem, Duke Math. J. 148 (2009), 63--80. · DOI
  10. P. Miao, Positive mass theorem on manifolds admitting corners along a hypersurface, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 6 (2002), 1163--1182. · DOI
  11. F. Morgan, Geometric Measure Theory: A Beginner's Guide, 2nd ed., Academic Press, San Diego, 1995. · DOI
  12. A. Neves, Insufficient convergence of inverse mean curvature flow on asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds, preprint,\arxiv0711.4335v1[math.DG]
  13. R. Penrose, Naked singularities, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 224 (1973), 125--134. · DOI · Paper page
  14. R. M. Schoen, ``Variational theory for the total scalar curvature functional for Riemannian metrics and related topics'' in Topics in Calculus of Variations (Montecatini Terme, Italy, 1987), Lecture Notes in Math. 1365, Springer, Berlin, 1989, 120--154. · DOI
  15. Y. Shi and L.-F. Tam, Positive mass theorem and the boundary behaviors of compact manifolds with nonnegative scalar curvature, J. Differential Geom. 62 (2002), 79--125. · DOI
  16. X. Wang, The mass of asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 57 (2001), 273--299. · DOI
  17. E. Witten, A new proof of the positive energy theorem, Comm. Math. Phys. 80 (1981), 381--402. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bray, H. L., & Lee, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Mathematics, Duke University
  • Department of Mathematics, Queens College, City University of New York
Venue
Duke Mathematical Journal
Published
2009-05-15
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
81-106
ISSN
  • 0012-7094
  • 1547-7398
Cited by
76
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review