Cited by 0Colonialism, slavery, and tradeHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaLatin American history and culture

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Honor y libertad: discursos y recursos en la estrategia de libertad de una mujer esclava:(Guayaquil a fines del período colonial)

Hamerly, Michael T.·2004·Hispanic American Historical Review

Abstract

Honor y libertad: discursos y recursos en la estrategia de libertad de una mujer esclava:(Guayaquil a fines del período colonial)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00182168-84-1-144

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Hamerly, M. T.
Affiliations
John Carter Brown Library (US)
Corresponding author
Hamerly, Michael T.
Venue
Hispanic American Historical Review
Published
2004-02-01
Volume
84
Issue
1
Pages
144-146
ISSN
  • 0018-2168 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1900
OpenAlex
W1969822717
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hispanic American Historical Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
Keywords
enslaved women, freedom suits, abolition of slavery, honor, Guayaquil, colonial Ecuador, late 18th century, court records, women's agency, Spanish colonial law, constructionism, postmodern historiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review