Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Autonomy of Asylum?

·2018·South Atlantic Quarterly
DOI 10.1215/00382876-4374823
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Amidst so many global-scale disruptions, we have witnessed a multitude of ensuing political spectacles of "crisis" choreographed within the frameworks of nation-states, reanimating nationalist projects, and commonly articulating themselves in the idiom of one or another reactionary populism from the genocidal pogroms against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar/Burma to the unabashed mass murder of alleged "drug addicts" in the Philippines, from the recurrent assassination of Vladimir Putin's political rivals and critical journalists in Russia to the sweeping repression following the attempted coup in Turkey, from the anti-refugee show trials in Hungary to the Kenyan government's moves to forcibly evacuate and shut down the Dadaab refugee camp near the Somali border, from Britain's referendum vote to exit the European Union (EU) to the election of Donald Trump to the U.S. presidency.In various forms, state authorities or those aspiring to state power have promulgated "emergency" measures as authoritarian remedies for one or another "crisis," by means of which "the people" must be protected (see De Genova, this volume).Interlaced with these hegemonic discursive formations of "crisis" and the effective staging of "crisis" across the world, and resulting more or less directly from the manifold states of exception that they have unleashed, countless real crises for the preservation and social reproduction of human life have ensued.These human disasters themselves have been rendered apprehensible to varying extents within hegemonic "crisis" formations as irruptions of one or another "humanitarian crisis" (Tazzioli et al. 2016).Such "humanitarian crises" are not uncommonly produced as cynical spectacles of misery for the further authorization of political manipulations and military interventions, even as they are derisively deployed to obfuscate other parallel human catastrophes altogether.In this special issue, we are interested in interrogating this proliferation of crises and "crisis"formations from the specific critical vantage point of the autonomy of migration.As the broad conceptual rubric for a heterogeneous field of critical inquiry and debate, pursued since the late

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/00382876-4374823

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bojadžijev Manuela Karakayali Serhat . 2010. “Recuperating the Sideshows of Capitalism: The Autonomy of Migration Today.” e-flux, no. 17. www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67379/recuperating-the-sideshows-of-capitalism-the-autonomy-of-migration-today.
  2. Bojadžijev, 2014, Was kommt nach dem Transnational Turn? Perspektiven für eine kritische Migrationsforschung” (“What Comes after the Transnational Turn? Perspectives for Critical Migration Research”), 10
  3. De Genova Nicholas . 2017d. “The ‘Migrant Crisis’ as Racial Crisis: Do Black Lives Matter in Europe?” Ethnic and Racial Studies, no. 44. Special Issue: Race and Crisis. dx.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361543. · DOI
  4. Foucault, (1976) 2007, The Meshes of Power, 153
  5. Foucault, (1984) 1994, The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom, 281
  6. Khosravi, 2016, Deportation as a Way of Life for Young Afghan Men, 169
  7. Mezzadra, 2001, Diritto di fuga: Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione (The Right to Escape: Migration, Citizenship, Globalization)
  8. Mezzadra, 2011, The Gaze of Autonomy: Capitalism, Migration, and Social Struggles, 121
  9. Mitropoulos, 2006, Autonomy, Recognition, Movement, Commoner, 5
  10. Picozza, 2017, ‘Dubliners’: Unthinking Displacement, Illegality, and Refugeeness within Europe’s Geographies of Asylum, 233
  11. Scheel, 2017, ‘The Secret Is to Look Good on Paper’: Appropriating Mobility within and against a Machine of Illegalization, 37
  12. Scheel, 2015, Politics of Protection, “New Keywords: Migration and Borders,” by Maribel Casas-Cortes et al., Cultural Studies, 29, 70
  13. Tazzioli, 2013, Migration (in) Crisis and ‘People Who Are Not of Our Concern’, 87
  14. Tazzioli, 2015, Migrant Struggles, “New Keywords: Migration and Borders,” by Maribel Casas-Cortes et al., Cultural Studies, 29, 80

Cited by

See all 121

Metadata

Venue
South Atlantic Quarterly
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2018-04-01
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
239-265
ISSN
  • 0038-2876
  • 1527-8026
DOI
10.1215/00382876-4374823
Cited by
121
References
61
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.