CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Migration and Exile StudiesColonialism, slavery, and tradeMigration, Racism, and Human Rights

Huida, cimarronaje y santuario: genealogías críticas para deseurocentrar la historia del refugio en el Atlántico Negro

Open access
Picozza, Fiorenza·2022·Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales
DOI 10.1344/sn2022.26.36875
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Aquest article traça una genealogia de la migració forçada i de les pràctiques de santuari, partint de l’experiència colonial del cimarronatge a les Amèriques i el Carib, la qual va comprendre gairebé quatre segles de resistència a la institució de l’esclavatge. A través d’una revisió de la literatura històrica, arqueològica i antropològica sobre rutes de fugida i assentaments cimarrons, d’una banda, i de literatura etnogràfica i periodística sobre trànsits, campaments i protestes migrants, d’una altra, l’article destaca diferents ressonàncies entre els dos fenòmens relatives a la producció d’espais autònoms, subjectivitats racialitzades, geografies legals i disputes jurídiques. El cimarronatge es presenta com a referència alternativa i innovadora per a des-eurocentrar la història del refugi i obrir la imaginació antropològica, en particular repensant la qüestió del santuari lluny de l’Estat, i centrant-se, en canvi, en les pràctiques de solidaritat amb i entre migrants que fugen d’opressions polítiques, econòmiques i socials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1344/sn2022.26.36875

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Picozza, F.
Affiliations
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Picozza, Fiorenza
Venue
Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales
Publisher
Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
ISSN
1138-9788 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1344/sn2022.26.36875
OpenAlex
W4283797871
Semantic Scholar
f90cea9350589f337d5d814995b7c79795c23c66
Cited by
2
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Licence
Locations
Scripta Nova Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Health › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
Keywords
cimarronaje, forced migration, sanctuaries, refuge, evacuation routes, slave resistance, Black Atlantic, decolonial historiography, racialized subjectivity, migrant solidarity, migrant camps, legal geography, legal dispute

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review