Editor's Note
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The FCA participated in the policy-making processes by motivating and mobilising civil society organisations around the world and, so, emerged as an important transnational actor during the negotiation.
“The FCA participated in the policy-making processes by motivating and mobilising (Peterson 1999) civil society organisations around the world and, so, emerged as an important transnational actor during the negotiation (Keck and Sikkink 1998).”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Peterson 1999
After approval of the treaty, the FCA shifted its attention to ensuring ratification and monitoring compliance of the FCTC, two key roles of civil society organisations.
“After approval of the treaty, the FCA shifted its attention to ensuring ratification and monitoring compliance of the FCTC, two key roles of civil society organisations (Peterson 1999).”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Peterson 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Mamudu, H. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2009) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441690802095355 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Peterson, M. A.
- Corresponding author
- Peterson, Mark A.
- Venue
- Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 1999-06-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 415-420
- ISSN
- 0361-6878 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1927
- OpenAlex
- W2443019928
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2015: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Keywords
- health policy, interest groups, advocacy, mobilization, monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Consumer Organizations, Decision Making, Organizational, Democracy, Group Processes, Health Policy, Humans, Lobbying, Motivation, Power, Psychological, Social Change, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
