The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas
Open accessAbstract
The North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) uses 6-month progression-free survival (6moPFS) as the efficacy end point of therapy trials for adult patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. In this study, we investigated whether progression status at 6 months predicts survival from that time, implying the potential for prolonged survival if progression could be delayed. We also evaluated earlier time points to determine whether the time of progression assessment alters the strength of the prediction. Data were from 596 patient enrollments (159 with grade III gliomas and 437 with grade IV tumors) in NABTC phase II protocols between February 1998 and December 2002. Outcome was assessed statistically using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Median survivals were 39 and 30 weeks for patients with grade III and grade IV tumors, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients with grade III and 16% of patients with grade IV tumors had progression-free survival of >26 weeks. Progression status at 9, 18, and 26 weeks predicted survival from those times for patients with grade III or grade IV tumors (p < 0.001 and hazard ratios < 0.5 in all cases). Including KPS, age, number of prior chemotherapies, and response in a multivariate model did not substantively change the results. Progression status at 6 months is a strong predictor of survival, and 6moPFS is a valid end point for trials of therapy for recurrent malignant glioma. Earlier assessments of progression status also predicted survival and may be incorporated in the design of future clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Yung, W. K. A., Albright, R. E., Olson, J., Fredericks, R., Fink, K., Prados, M. D., Brada, M., Spence, A., Hohl, R. J., Shapiro, W., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316 · Cited by 929
Self-citationOutcomes and Prognostic Factors in Recurrent Glioma Patients Enrolled Onto Phase II Clinical Trials
Wong, E. T., Hess, K. R., Gleason, M. J., Jaeckle, K. A., Kyritsis, A. P., Prados, M. D., Levin, V. A., & Yung, W. K. A. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2572 · Cited by 902
Self-citation
Cited by
Cloughesy, T. F., Mochizuki, A. Y., Orpilla, J. R., Hugo, W., Lee, A. H., Davidson, T. B., Wang, A. C., Ellingson, B. M., Rytlewski, J. A., Sanders, C. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0337-7 · Cited by 1,382
Self-citationWen, P. Y., Weller, M., Lee, E. Q., Alexander, B. M., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Barthel, F. P., Batchelor, T. T., Bindra, R. S., Chang, S. M., Chiocca, E. A., et al. (2020) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa106 · Cited by 1,168
Self-citationTransport of drugs across the blood–brain barrier by nanoparticles.
Wohlfart, S., Gelperina, S., & Kreuter, J. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.08.017 · Cited by 715
Butowski, N., Colman, H., De Groot, J. F., Omuro, A. M., Nayak, L., Wen, P. Y., Cloughesy, T. F., Marimuthu, A., Haidar, S., Perry, A., et al. (2016) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov245 · Cited by 593
Self-citationLu-Emerson, C., Duda, D. G., Emblem, K. E., Taylor, J. W., Gerstner, E. R., Loeffler, J. S., Batchelor, T. T., & Jain, R. K. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2014.55.9575 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamborn, K. R., Yung, W. K. A., Chang, S. M., Wen, P. Y., Cloughesy, T. F., DeAngelis, L. M., Robins, H. I., Lieberman, F. S., Fine, H. A., Fink, K. L., Junck, L., Abrey, L., Gilbert, M. R., Mehta, M., Kuhn, J. G., Aldape, K. D., Hibberts, J., Peterson, P. M., & Prados, M. D.
- Venue
- Neuro-Oncology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-170
- ISSN
- 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-5866
- OpenAlex
- W2001355942
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/15228517-2007-062
- The paper
- Lamborn, K. R., Yung, W. K. A., Chang, S. M., Wen, P. Y., Cloughesy, T. F., DeAngelis, L. M., Robins, H. I., Lieberman, F. S., Fine, H. A., Fink, K. L., Junck, L., Abrey, L., Gilbert, M. R., Mehta, M., Kuhn, J. G., Aldape, K. D., Hibberts, J., Peterson, P. M., & Prados, M. D. (2008). Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.