Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 421

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas

Open access
Lamborn, Kathleen R., Yung, W. K. Alfred, Chang, Susan M., Wen, Patrick Y., Cloughesy, Timothy F., DeAngelis, Lisa M., Robins, H. Ian, Lieberman, Frank S., Fine, Howard A., Fink, Karen L., Junck, Larry, Abrey, Lauren, Gilbert, Mark R., Mehta, Minesh, Kuhn, John G., Aldape, Kenneth D., Hibberts, Janelle, Peterson, Pamela M., Prados, Michael D.·2008·Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

The North American Brain Tumor Consortium (NABTC) uses 6-month progression-free survival (6moPFS) as the efficacy end point of therapy trials for adult patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. In this study, we investigated whether progression status at 6 months predicts survival from that time, implying the potential for prolonged survival if progression could be delayed. We also evaluated earlier time points to determine whether the time of progression assessment alters the strength of the prediction. Data were from 596 patient enrollments (159 with grade III gliomas and 437 with grade IV tumors) in NABTC phase II protocols between February 1998 and December 2002. Outcome was assessed statistically using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Median survivals were 39 and 30 weeks for patients with grade III and grade IV tumors, respectively. Twenty-eight percent of patients with grade III and 16% of patients with grade IV tumors had progression-free survival of >26 weeks. Progression status at 9, 18, and 26 weeks predicted survival from those times for patients with grade III or grade IV tumors (p < 0.001 and hazard ratios < 0.5 in all cases). Including KPS, age, number of prior chemotherapies, and response in a multivariate model did not substantively change the results. Progression status at 6 months is a strong predictor of survival, and 6moPFS is a valid end point for trials of therapy for recurrent malignant glioma. Earlier assessments of progression status also predicted survival and may be incorporated in the design of future clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/15228517-2007-062

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 421

Metadata

Authors
Lamborn, K. R., Yung, W. K. A., Chang, S. M., Wen, P. Y., Cloughesy, T. F., DeAngelis, L. M., Robins, H. I., Lieberman, F. S., Fine, H. A., Fink, K. L., Junck, L., Abrey, L., Gilbert, M. R., Mehta, M., Kuhn, J. G., Aldape, K. D., Hibberts, J., Peterson, P. M., & Prados, M. D.
Venue
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2008-04-01
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
162-170
ISSN
  • 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5866
OpenAlex
W2001355942
Cited by
421
References
3
FWCI
16.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/15228517-2007-062
The paper
Lamborn, K. R., Yung, W. K. A., Chang, S. M., Wen, P. Y., Cloughesy, T. F., DeAngelis, L. M., Robins, H. I., Lieberman, F. S., Fine, H. A., Fink, K. L., Junck, L., Abrey, L., Gilbert, M. R., Mehta, M., Kuhn, J. G., Aldape, K. D., Hibberts, J., Peterson, P. M., & Prados, M. D. (2008). Progression-free survival: An important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2007-062

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.