Cited by 5Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentMeningioma and schwannoma managementBrain Metastases and Treatment

Abstracts from the 2009 joint meeting of the society for neuro-oncology (SNO) and the American association of neurological surgeons/congress of neurological surgeons (AANS/CNS) section on tumors

Open access
Wright, Karen D., Vikki Rand, Leary, Sarah E., Johnson, Robert A., Poppleton, Helen, Murugesan, Mohankumar, Mack, Stephen, Coyle, Beth +8 more·2009·Neuro-Oncology

Abstract

To identify genetic alterations that underlie ependymoma tumorigenesis, we conducted an extensive and comprehensive analysis of the structure and expression of 204 ependymoma genomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/15228517-2009-034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inconsistent direction of study-level effects indicates that "other cancer" is not a uniform comparator category.

    “also indicates that “other cancer” is not a uniform comparator category.29”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Results (p. 2) describe two virtual-reality surgical simulation scenarios, not comparisons among cancer groups. Searches for inconsistent study-level effects and an “other cancer” comparator found no passage addressing either point in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The inconsistent direction of study-level effects in this review is compatible with the interpretation that glioma caregivers may experience a distinctive form of burden.

    “The inconsistent direction of study-level effects in this review is compatible with that interpretation”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Introduction and Results (p. 2) discuss a virtual-reality simulator for brain tumor surgery, not caregiver burden. Searches for glioma caregivers, caregiver burden, and inconsistent study-level effects found no passage addressing the claimed interpretation. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neuro-oncology literature suggests that glioma caregivers may experience a particularly distinctive form of burden because patient cognitive, behavioural, and communication changes can disrupt relationships, shared decision-making, and daily family functioning in ways that are less prominent in many other cancers.

    “Conversely, neuro-oncology literature suggests that glioma caregivers may experience a particularly distinctive form of burden because patient cognitive, behavioural, and communication changes can disrupt relationships, shared decision-making, and daily family functioning in ways that are less prominent in many other cancers.”

    From Caregiver burden, quality of life, and psychosocial outcomes among informal caregivers of patients with glioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [29]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, K. D., Rand, V., Leary, S. E., Johnson, R. A., Poppleton, H., Murugesan, M., Mack, S., Coyle, B., Gillespie, G. Y., Allen, J. C., Gajjar, A., Boop, F. A., Sanford, R. A., Taylor, M. D., Grundy, R. G., & Gilbertson, R. J.
Venue
Neuro-Oncology
Published
2009-10-01
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
563-699
ISSN
  • 1522-8517 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-5866
OpenAlex
W3018827483
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuro-Oncology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Meningioma and schwannoma management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
Keywords
brain tumors, neurosurgery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review