The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Challenging Convictions
Abstract
This essay, with accompanying lesson plan, explores how race-radical Black and Indigenous feminists theorize and resist the carceral state violence of White settler nations of Canada and the United States. It focuses on the theoretical interventions driven by Indigenous and Black race-radical feminists and how this has placed these activists at the forefront of anti-violence movement-building. Such an intervention specifically upholds the tensions within and refuses to collapse political approaches of Indigenous movements for sovereignty and Black race-radical traditions. Its transnational, comparative focus helps us to not only identify but to create multiple strategies that dismantle the carceral state and the racialized gendered violence that it mobilizes and sustains. Proceeding from the argument that both prison abolitionist praxis and race-radical feminist praxis are inherently and primarily pedagogical, the lesson plan explores the ways we learn, teach, and organize in a manner that teaches against the grain of carceral common sense.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unlike mainstream feminism, which has been critiqued for recentring Whiteness and heteronormativity, Black feminism has been used by archaeologists to examine the intersections between race, gender and class in the past, as well as in contemporary power relations within the discipline.
“Unlike mainstream feminism, which has been critiqued for recentring Whiteness and heteronormativity, Black feminism has been used by archaeologists to examine the intersections between race, gender and class in the past, as well as in contemporary power relations within the discipline (Palacios 2020;King 2021).”
From The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration (2023) · cites this paper as Palacios 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Cacho, 2007, ‘“You Just Don’t Know How Much He Meant’: Deviancy, Death, and Devaluation, Latino Studies, 5, 182, 10.1057/palgrave.lst.8600246 · DOI
- Gilmore, 2007, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California
- Gilmore, 2007, In the Shadow of the Shadow State, 41
- Hartman, 2007, Lose Your Mother: A Journey along the Atlantic Slave Route
- INCITE! Women of Color Against Violence, 2005, Gender Violence and the Prison Industrial Complex: Interpersonal and State Violence against Women of Color
- Jackson, 2010, Feeling Like a Failure: Teaching/Learning Abolition Through the Good the Bad and the Innocent, Radical Teacher, 88, 20, 10.1353/rdt.2010.0008 · DOI
- James, 1999, Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics, 10.1007/978-1-137-06751-7 · DOI
- James, 2000, Radicalizing Feminism, 239
- James, 2002, Shadowboxing: Representations of Black Feminist Politics
- Million, 2011, Intense Dreaming: Theories, Narratives, and Our Search for Home, The American Indian Quarterly, 35, 313, 10.5250/amerindiquar.35.3.0313 · DOI
- Ogden, 2005, The Prison-Industrial Complex in Indigenous California, 57
- Ogden, 2006, Pomo Woman, Ex-Prisoner, Speaks Out, 164
- Palacios, 2016, ‘Something Else to Be’: A Chicana Survivor’s Journey from Vigilante Justice to Transformative Justice, philoSOPHIA A Journal of Continental Feminism, 6, 93
- Rojas, 2007, Are the Cops in Our Heads and Hearts?, 198
- Simpson, 2011, Dancing on Our Turtle’s Back: Stories of Nishnaabeg Re-creation, Resurgence, and a New Emergence
- Sudbury, 2009, Challenging Penal Democracy: Activist Scholars and the Antiprison Movement, 17
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The future of archaeology is (still) community collaboration
Montgomery, L. M., & Fryer, T. C. (2023) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2023.98 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Palacios, L.
- Venue
- Meridians
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2020-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 522-547
- ISSN
- 1536-6936
- 1547-8424
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review