The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
On the multiple frontiers of extraction: excavating contemporary capitalism
Mezzadra, S., & Neilson, B. (2017) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2017.1303425 · Cited by 305
Big Tech: Four Emerging Forms of Digital Rentiership
Birch, K., & Cochrane, D. T. (2022) · Science as Culture · doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.1932794 · Cited by 121
Schurr, C. (2017) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1177/0263775816638851 · Cited by 91
Vertommen, S., & Barbagallo, C. (2022) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1866642 · Cited by 43
‘Basically He’s a Pet, Not a Working Dog’: Theorising What Therapy Dogs Do in the Workplace
Charles, N., & Wolkowitz, C. (2024) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/09500170231161495 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, M., & Waldby, C.
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2014
- OpenAlex
- W4234549826
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 51.69
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/9780822377009
- The paper
- Cooper, M., & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical Labor: Tissue Donors and Research Subjects in the Global Bioeconomy. Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822377009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
