The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity
Abstract
Much of the writing inTouching Feeling originally appeared in other contexts.But this collection of essays also represents a distinct project, one that has occupied a decade's work, which has nonetheless, and with increasing stubbornness, refused to become linear in structure.I think it is best described as a project to explore promising tools and techniques for nondualistic thought and pedagogy.No doubt the ambition of thinking other than dualistically itself shaped the project's resistance to taking the form of a book-length, linear argument on a single topic.A lot of voices tell us to think nondualistically, and even what to think in that fashion.Fewer are able to transmit how to go about it, the cognitive and even affective habits and practices involved, which are less than amenable to being couched in prescriptive forms.At best, I'd hope for this book to prompt recognition in some of the many people who successfully work in such ways; and where some approaches may be new or unarticulated, a sense of possibility.The ideal I'm envisioning here is a mind receptive to thoughts, able to nurture and connect them, and susceptible to happiness in their entertainment.Especially since the 1960s any number of Western academic, popular, and professional discourses have been cumulatively invoking nondualistic approaches in physics, gender and sexuality, art, psychology and psychoanaly-
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In contrast with the Buddhist tradition's general reverence for the inherent efficacy of the vow, here and elsewhere the Lengyan jing offers interesting examples of what Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick calls the “periperformative” -that is, circumstances surrounding a performative act that undermine its coherence and efficacy (2003: chapter 2).”
From Possessing Enlightenment: Sorcery, Selfhood, and Tragic Responsibility in a Chinese Buddhist Apocryphon (2023) · cites this paper as Sedgwick 2003
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,002 of 1,002
Lecrosnier, A. (2007) · Critique · doi:10.3917/criti.716.0058 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Sedgwick, E. K.
- Corresponding author
- Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W4235975748
- Cited by
- 2,464
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 113 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 196 · 2020: 270 · 2019: 289 · 2018: 213 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 119 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 133 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 131
- FWCI
- 84.94
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- dualism, affect, pedagogy, cognitive habits, affective practices, happiness, philosophy of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review