CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 522Posthumanist Ethics and ActivismAnthropological Studies and InsightsMarxism and Critical Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Materiality: An Introduction

Miller, Daniel·2005·Materiality
DOI 10.1215/9780822386711-001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1215/9780822386711-001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–522 of 522

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Miller, D.
Corresponding author
Miller, Daniel
ORCID
Miller, Daniel
Venue
Materiality
Publisher
Duke University Press
Published
2005
Pages
1-50
DOI
10.1215/9780822386711-001
OpenAlex
W2478339902
Cited by
521
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 27
FWCI
126.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
Keywords
materiality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review