The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Materiality: An Introduction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, while debates about the power of things are central to Latour ' s theories, anthropologists such as Igor Kopytoff (1986), Alfred Gell (1998), Daniel Miller (2005), Tim Ingold (2011) and archaeologists like Ian Hodder (2012) have long discussed them.”
From Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns (2013) · cites this paper as Miller 2005
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Ecology of Materials
Ingold, T. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920 · Cited by 848
Introduction: Resource Materialities
Richardson, T., & Weszkalnys, G. (2014) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.1353/anq.2014.0007 · Cited by 433
Taste Regimes and Market-Mediated Practice
Arsel, Z., & Bean, J. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/666595 · Cited by 457
(2011) · Cited by 368
The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production
Born, G. (2010) · Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1177/1749975510368471 · Cited by 296
“The first, evident in the work of Alfred Gell, Daniel Miller and Christopher Pinney, focuses on the cultural object and the forms of mediation through which it is constituted and which in turn it inaugurates. These writers vigorously contest the continuing resort in sociology and anthropology to the sterile trope of s…”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, D.
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Daniel
- ORCID
- Miller, Daniel
- Venue
- Materiality
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 1-50
- OpenAlex
- W2478339902
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 126.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
- Keywords
- materiality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
