The DOI matches its Crossref record.
New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics
Abstract
New Materialisms brings into focus and explains the significance of the innovative materialist critiques that are emerging across the social sciences and humanities. By gathering essays that exemplify the new thinking about matter and processes of materialization, this important collection shows how scholars are reworking older materialist traditions, contemporary theoretical debates, and advances in scientific knowledge to address pressing ethical and political challenges. In the introduction, Diana Coole and Samantha Frost highlight common themes among the distinctive critical projects that comprise the new materialisms. The continuities they discern include a posthumanist conception of matter as lively or exhibiting agency, and a reengagement with both the material realities of everyday life and broader geopolitical and socioeconomic structures.Coole and Frost argue that contemporary economic, environmental, geopolitical, and technological developments demand new accounts of nature, agency, and social and political relationships; modes of inquiry that privilege consciousness and subjectivity are not adequate to the task. New materialist philosophies are needed to do justice to the complexities of twenty-first-century biopolitics and political economy, because they raise fundamental questions about the place of embodied humans in a material world and the ways that we produce, reproduce, and consume our material environment.ContributorsSara AhmedJane BennettRosi BraidottiPheng CheahRey ChowWilliam E. ConnollyDiana CooleJason EdwardsSamantha FrostElizabeth GroszSonia KruksMelissa A. Orlie
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data
Taguchi, H. L. (2012) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700112456001 · Cited by 417
“I Would Rather be a Cyborg than a Goddess”
Puar, J. K. (2020) · Feminist Theory Reader · doi:10.4324/9781003001201-47 · Cited by 296
Affecting feminism: Questions of feeling in feminist theory
Pedwell, C., & Whitehead, A. (2012) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/1464700112442635 · Cited by 289
Mediants, Materiality, Normativity
Appadurai, A. (2015) · Public Culture · doi:10.1215/08992363-2841832 · Cited by 265
Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty
Taffel, S. (2016) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/1354856514567827 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W1573107679
- Cited by
- 1,880
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 126.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1215/9780822392996
- The paper
- New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. (2010). Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822392996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.