The Fetish Revisited: Marx, Freud, and the Gods Black People Make
Abstract
Since the early-modern encounter between African and European merchants on the Guinea Coast, European social critics have invoked African gods as metaphors for misplaced value and agency, using the term “fetishism” chiefly to assert the irrationality of their fellow Europeans. Yet, as J. Lorand Matory demonstrates in The Fetish Revisited, Afro-Atlantic gods have a materially embodied social logic of their own, which is no less rational than the social theories of Marx and Freud. Drawing on thirty-six years of fieldwork in Africa, Europe, and the Americas, Matory casts an Afro-Atlantic eye on European theory to show how Marx’s and Freud’s conceptions of the fetish both illuminate and misrepresent Africa’s human-made gods. Through this analysis, the priests, practices, and spirited things of four major Afro-Atlantic religions simultaneously call attention to the culture-specific, materially conditioned, physically embodied, and indeed fetishistic nature of Marx’s and Freud’s theories themselves. Challenging long-held assumptions about the nature of gods and theories, Matory offers a novel perspective on the social roots of these tandem African and European understandings of collective action, while illuminating the relationship of European social theory to the racism suffered by Africans and assimilated Jews alike.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Only recently have these African-based religious orders made a comeback as those in power from Africa to Brazil, Cuba and Haiti to the United States have begun to accept and even be initiated into them.
“Only recently have they made a comeback as those in power -from Africa to Brazil, Cuba and Haiti to the United States-have begun to accept and even be initiated into these various African-based religious orders (Matory, 2018, p. 1-11;; Brown, 2011).”
From Gothic "Voodoo" in Africa and Haiti (2019) · cites this paper as Matory, 2018, p. 1-11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gothic "Voodoo" in Africa and Haiti
Montgomery, E. J. (2019) · eTropic: electronic journal of studies in the tropics · doi:10.25120/etropic.18.1.2019.3666 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matory, J. L.
- Corresponding author
- Matory, J. Lorand
- Venue
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2018-10-26
- OpenAlex
- W2987730496
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Duke University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Duke University Press eBooks
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Education › African cultural and philosophical studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- fetishism, Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, materiality of religion, Guinea coast, racism, collective action, African diaspora
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review