The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase II Clinical Trial of Moderate Hypothermia after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether moderate hypothermia (HYPO) (32-33 degrees C) begun in the early period after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and maintained for 48 hours is safe compared with normothermia (NORM) (36.5-37.5 degrees C). METHODS: After severe (Glasgow Coma Scale score < or =8) nonpenetrating TBI, 48 children less than 13 years of age admitted within 6 hours of injury were randomized after stratification by age to moderate HYPO (32-33 degrees C) treatment in conjunction with standardized head injury management versus NORM in a multicenter trial. An additional 27 patients were entered into a parallel single-institution trial of excluded patients because of late transfer or consent (delayed in transfer >6 h but within 24 h of admission), unknown time of injury (e.g., child abuse), and adolescence (e.g., aged 13-18 yr). Assessments of safety included mortality, infection, coagulopathy, arrhythmias, and hemorrhage as well as ability to maintain target temperature, mean intracranial pressure (ICP), and percent time of ICP less than 20 mm Hg during the cooling and subsequent rewarming phases. Additionally, assessments of neurocognitive outcomes were obtained at 3 and 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Moderate HYPO after severe TBI in children was found to be safe relative to standard management and NORM in children of all ages and in children with delay of initiation of treatment up to 24 hours. Although there was decreased mortality in HYPO in both studies, there was an increased potential for arrhythmias with HYPO, although they were manageable with fluid administration or rewarming. Additionally, there was a reduction in mean ICP during the first 72 hours after injury in both studies, although rebound ICP elevations in HYPO compared with those in NORM were noted for up to 10 to 12 hours after rewarming. Although functional outcome at 3 or 6 months did not differ between treatment groups, functional outcome tended to improve from the 3- to 6-month cognitive assessment in HYPO compared with NORM, although the sample size was too small for any definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION: HYPO is likely a safe therapeutic intervention for children after severe TBI up to 24 hours after injury. Further studies are necessary and warranted to determine its effect on functional outcome and intracranial hypertension.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Children often respond differently to injury due to their distinct physiology and metabolic differences from adults, which may explain their less favorable outcomes [22].”
From Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WILSON, J. T. L., PETTIGREW, L. E. L., & TEASDALE, G. M. (1998) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.1998.15.573 · Cited by 2,386
Cited by
Adelson, P. D., Pineda, J., Bell, M. J., Abend, N. S., Berger, R. P., Giza, C. C., Hotz, G., & Wainwright, M. S. (2012) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1952 · Cited by 93
Self-citationNaseri Alavi, S. A., Habibi, M. A., Majdi, A., Hajikarimloo, B., Rashidi, F., Fathi Tavani, S., Minaee, P., Eazi, S. M., & Kobets, A. J. (2024) · Children · doi:10.3390/children11060701 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Adelson, P. D., Ragheb, J., Muizelaar, J. P., Kanev, P., Brockmeyer, D., Beers, S. R., Brown, S. D., Cassidy, L. D., Chang, Y., & Levin, H.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2005-04-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 740-754
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4040
- OpenAlex
- W2163173773
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.