The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GLIOMA EXTENT OF RESECTION AND ITS IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is still no general consensus in the literature regarding the role of extent of glioma resection in improving patient outcome. Although the importance of resection in obtaining tissue diagnosis and alleviating symptoms is clear, a lack of Class I evidence prevents similar certainty in assessing the influence of extent of resection. METHODS: We reviewed every major clinical publication since 1990 on the role of extent of resection in glioma outcome. RESULTS: Twenty-eight high-grade glioma articles and 10 low-grade glioma articles were examined in terms of quality of evidence, expected extent of resection, and survival benefit. CONCLUSION: Despite persistent limitations in the quality of data, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resection is associated with longer life expectancy for both low- and high-grade gliomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs
Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006223422507 · Cited by 3,563
Stummer, W., Pichlmeier, U., Meinel, T., Wiestler, O. D., Zanella, F., & Reulen, H.-J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 · Cited by 3,423
A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials.
Benson, K., & Hartz, A. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006223422506 · Cited by 2,347
Role of extent of resection in the long-term outcome of low-grade hemispheric gliomas
Smith, J. S., Chang, E. F., Lamborn, K. R., Chang, S. M., Prados, M. D., Cha, S., Tihan, T., VandenBerg, S., McDermott, M. W., & Berger, M. S. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2007.13.9337 · Cited by 1,283
Self-citationFunctional Outcome after Language Mapping for Glioma Resection
Sanai, N., Mirzadeh, Z., & Berger, M. S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067819 · Cited by 1,065
Self-citation
Cited by
Wen, P. Y., & Kesari, S. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0708126 · Cited by 3,511
An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas: Clinical article
Sanai, N., Polley, M.-Y., McDermott, M. W., Parsa, A. T., & Berger, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2011.2.jns10998 · Cited by 1,646
Self-citationExciting New Advances in Neuro-Oncology: The Avenue to a Cure for Malignant Glioma
Van Meir, E. G., Hadjipanayis, C. G., Norden, A. D., Shu, H. K., Wen, P. Y., & Olson, J. J. (2010) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20069 · Cited by 1,372
Impact of Intraoperative Stimulation Brain Mapping on Glioma Surgery Outcome: A Meta-Analysis
De Witt Hamer, P. C., Robles, S. G., Zwinderman, A. H., Duffau, H., & Berger, M. S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.38.4818 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationSarkaria, J. N., Hu, L. S., Parney, I. F., Pafundi, D. H., Brinkmann, D. H., Laack, N. N., Giannini, C., Burns, T. C., Kizilbash, S. H., Laramy, J. K., et al. (2018) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nox175 · Cited by 746
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanai, N., & Berger, M. S.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 753-766
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141570482
- Cited by
- 1,328
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GLIOMA EXTENT OF RESECTION AND ITS IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf
- The paper
- Sanai, N., & Berger, M. S. (2008). GLIOMA EXTENT OF RESECTION AND ITS IMPACT ON PATIENT OUTCOME. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
