The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Drosophila pho-like gene encodes a YY1-related DNA binding protein that is redundant with pleiohomeotic in homeotic gene silencing
Open accessAbstract
Polycomb group proteins (PcG) repress homeotic genes in cells where these genes must remain inactive during Drosophila and vertebrate development. This repression depends on cis-acting silencer sequences, called Polycomb group response elements (PREs). Pleiohomeotic (Pho), the only known sequence-specific DNA-binding PcG protein, binds to PREs but phomutants show only mild phenotypes compared with other PcG mutants. We characterize pho-like, a gene encoding a protein with high similarity to Pho. Pho-like binds to Pho-binding sites in vitro and pho-like,pho double mutants show more severe misexpression of homeotic genes than do the single mutants. These results suggest that Pho and Pho-like act redundantly to repress homeotic genes. We examined the distribution of five PcG proteins on polytene chromosomes from pho-like, pho double mutants. Pc, Psc, Scm, E(z) and Ph remain bound to polytene chromosomes at most sites in the absence of Pho and Pho-like. At a few chromosomal locations,however, some of the PcG proteins are no longer present in the absence of Pho and Pho-like, suggesting that Pho-like and Pho may anchor PcG protein complexes to only a subset of PREs. Alternatively, Pho-like and Pho may not participate in the anchoring of PcG complexes, but may be necessary for transcriptional repression mediated through PREs. In contrast to Pho and Pho-like, removal of Trithorax-like/GAGA factor or Zeste, two other DNA-binding proteins implicated in PRE function, does not cause misexpression of homeotic genes or reporter genes in imaginal disks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Polycomb silencing mechanisms and the management of genomic programmes
Schwartz, Y. B., & Pirrotta, V. (2007) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1981 · Cited by 868
Hierarchical Recruitment of Polycomb Group Silencing Complexes
Wang, L., Brown, J. L., Cao, R., Zhang, Y., Kassis, J. A., & Jones, R. S. (2004) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.05.009 · Cited by 561
Self-citationSignals and Combinatorial Functions of Histone Modifications
Suganuma, T., & Workman, J. L. (2011) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-061809-175347 · Cited by 499
Polycomb/Trithorax response elements and epigenetic memory of cell identity
Ringrose, L., & Paro, R. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02723 · Cited by 444
Yin Yang 1 is a critical regulator of B-cell development
Liu, H., Schmidt-Supprian, M., Shi, Y., Hobeika, E., Barteneva, N., Jumaa, H., Pelanda, R., Reth, M., Skok, J., Rajewsky, K., et al. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1529307 · Cited by 264
Epigenetically Heritable Alteration of Fly Development in Response to Toxic Challenge
Stern, S., Fridmann-Sirkis, Y., Braun, E., & Soen, Y. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.03.012 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, J. L., Fritsch, C., Mueller, J., & Kassis, J. A.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-01-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 285-294
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2128624858
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.