Transcriptional regulation of mitfa accounts for the sox10 requirement in zebrafish melanophore development
Abstract
The transcription factor Sox10 is required for the specification, migration and survival of all nonectomesenchymal neural crest derivatives including melanophores. sox10-/- zebrafish lack expression of the transcription factor mitfa, which itself is required for melanophore development. We demonstrate that the zebrafish mitfa promoter has sox10 binding sites necessary for activity in vitro, consistent with studies using mammalian cell cultures that have shown that Sox10 directly regulates Mitf expression. In addition, we demonstrate that these sites are necessary for promoter activity in vivo. We show that reintroduction of mitfa expression in neural crest cells can rescue melanophore development in sox10-/- embryos. This rescue of melanophores in sox10-/- embryos is quantitatively indistinguishable from rescue in mitfa-/- embryos. These findings show that the essential function of sox10 in melanophore development is limited to transcriptional regulation of mitfa. We propose that the dominant melanophore phenotype in Waardenburg syndrome IV individuals with SOX10 mutations is likely to result from failure to activate MITF in the normal number of melanoblasts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mitfa is the master regulator of melanocyte fate.
“Mitfa is thus dubbed the ‘master regulator’ of melanocyte fate choice [13, 21, 25].”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Mitfa is necessary and sufficient to upregulate numerous melanocyte differentiation genes, including those controlling melanin synthesis.
“Like its mammalian counterpart, MITF, Mitfa has been proven necessary and sufficient to upregulate numerous melanocyte differentiation genes, including those controlling melanin synthesis (e.g. dct, silva and tyrosinase).”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Sox10, in conjunction with Wnt signalling, is required to activate and maintain mitfa transcription.
“In this lineage, Sox10, in conjunction with Wnt signalling, is required to activate and maintain mitfa transcription [13, 20, 24–26].”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Mitfa is able to efficiently rescue melanocyte development in the absence of sox10 through triggering both an Mitfa autoregulatory feedback loop and expression of melanocyte differentiation genes.
“For example, Mitfa is able to efficiently rescue melanocyte development in the absence of sox10 through triggering both an Mitfa autoregulatory feedback loop and expression of melanocyte differentiation genes [13, 25].”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
sox10 is required for mitfa expression in late Cbls, and mitfa can promote melanocyte fate in the absence of sox10 if misexpressed.
“Furthermore, this requirement of pigment cells for sox10 manifests itself apparently in different ways; sox10 is required for mitfa expression in late Cbls, and mitfa can promote melanocyte fate in the absence of sox10 if misexpressed [25].”
From The MITF paralog tfec is required in neural crest development for fate specification of the iridophore lineage from a multipotent pigment cell progenitor (2021) · cites this paper as [25]
Previously published experimental data show that maintenance of mitfa is restricted to melanocytes.
“These predictions are in contrast to previously published experimental data, showing that maintenance of mitfa is restricted to melanocytes [21], [22], although lower level mitfa expression has been detected by RNA-seq in differentiated iridophores [48].”
From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
In all three models, expression of mitfa was predicted to be upregulated and then maintained in the iridophore lineage.
“In all three models, expression of the melanocyte marker, mitfa, a direct target of Sox10 [21], was predicted to be upregulated and then maintained in the iridophore lineage (Fig 5D–5F).”
From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Sox10 binds directly to the promoter of mitfa in zebrafish and activates its expression.
“Sox10 has been previously shown to bind directly to the promoter of mitfa in zebrafish, and to activate its expression [21], we thus include that interaction.”
From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
All three models predict failure to upregulate mitfa and pnp4a upon loss of Sox10 function.
“Likewise, they appropriately predict the failure to upregulate both mitfa [21] and pnp4a (Fig 4K).”
From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [21]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petratou, K., Subkhankulova, T., Lister, J. A., Rocco, A., Schwetlick, H., & Kelsh, R. N. (2018) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1007402 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationPetratou, K., Spencer, S. A., Kelsh, R. N., & Lister, J. A. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0244794 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationAn ongoing role for<i>Wnt</i>signaling in differentiating melanocytes in vivo
Vibert, L., Aquino, G., Gehring, I., Subkankulova, T., Schilling, T. F., Rocco, A., & Kelsh, R. N. (2017) · Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research · doi:10.1111/pcmr.12568 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Elworthy, S., Lister, J. A., Carney, T. J., Raible, D. W., & Kelsh, R. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Bath (GB)
- University of Washington (US)
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY,UK
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-06-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2809-2818
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2026321840
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › melanin and skin pigmentation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
- Keywords
- SOX10, mitfa, MITF, transcriptional regulation, neural crest, melanoblasts, zebrafish, SOX10 mutation, promoter binding sites
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Crosses, Genetic, DNA-Binding Proteins, High Mobility Group Proteins, Melanophores, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription Factors, Zebrafish, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Zebrafish Proteins, Microphthalmia-Associated Transcription Factor, SOXE Transcription Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review