The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Targeted ablation of CCAP neuropeptide-containing neurons of Drosophila causes specific defects in execution and circadian timing of ecdysis behavior
Abstract
Insect growth and metamorphosis is punctuated by molts, during which a new cuticle is produced. Every molt culminates in ecdysis, the shedding of the remains of the old cuticle. Both the timing of ecdysis relative to the molt and the actual execution of this vital insect behavior are under peptidergic neuronal control. Based on studies in the moth, Manduca sexta, it has been postulated that the neuropeptide Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP)plays a key role in the initiation of the ecdysis motor program. We have used Drosophila bearing targeted ablations of CCAP neurons (CCAP KO animals) to investigate the role of CCAP in the execution and circadian regulation of ecdysis. CCAP KO animals showed specific defects at ecdysis, yet the severity and nature of the defects varied at different developmental stages. The majority of CCAP KO animals died at the pupal stage from the failure of pupal ecdysis, whereas larval ecdysis and adult eclosion behaviors showed only subtle defects. Interestingly, the most severe failure seen at eclosion appeared to be in a function required for abdominal inflation, which could be cardioactive in nature. Although CCAP KO populations exhibited circadian eclosion rhythms, the daily distribution of eclosion events (i.e.,gating) was abnormal. Effects on the execution of ecdysis and its circadian regulation indicate that CCAP is a key regulator of the behavior. Nevertheless, an unexpected finding of this work is that the primary functions of CCAP as well as its importance in the control of ecdysis behaviors may change during the postembryonic development of Drosophila.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Luan, H., Peabody, N. C., Vinson, C. R., & White, B. H. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.08.028 · Cited by 500
Circadian Organization of Behavior and Physiology in Drosophila
Allada, R., & Chung, B. Y. (2010) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135815 · Cited by 455
A genetic, genomic, and computational resource for exploring neural circuit function
Davis, F. P., Nern, A., Picard, S., Reiser, M. B., Rubin, G. M., Eddy, S. R., & Henry, G. L. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.50901 · Cited by 268
Luo, C.-W., Dewey, E. M., Sudo, S., Ewer, J., Hsu, S. Y., Honegger, H.-W., & Hsueh, A. J. W. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409916102 · Cited by 273
Self-citationRhea, J. M., Wegener, C., & Bender, M. (2010) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000967 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, J. H., Schroeder, A. J., Helfrich-Förster, C., Jackson, F. R., & Ewer, J.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-06-15
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2645-2656
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2150781455
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.