The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Novel as1 and as2 defects in leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity reveal the requirement for ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and 2 and ERECTA functions in specifying leaf adaxial identity
Abstract
The shoot apical meristem (SAM) of seed plants is the site at which lateral organs are formed. Once organ primordia initiate from the SAM, they establish polarity along the adaxial-abaxial, proximodistal and mediolateral axes. Among these three axes, the adaxial-abaxial polarity is of primary importance in leaf patterning. In leaf development, once the adaxial-abaxial axis is established within leaf primordia, it provides cues for proper lamina growth and asymmetric development. It was reported previously that the Arabidopsis ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 (AS1) and ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2 (AS2) genes are two key regulators of leaf polarity. In this work, we demonstrate a new function of the AS1 and AS2genes in the establishment of adaxial-abaxial polarity by analyzing as1 and as2 alleles in the Landsberg erecta(Ler) genetic background. We provide genetic evidence that the Arabidopsis ERECTA (ER) gene is involved in the AS1-AS2 pathway to promote leaf adaxial fate. In addition, we show that AS1 and AS2 bind to each other, suggesting that AS1 and AS2 may form a complex that regulates the establishment of leaf polarity. We also report the effects on leaf polarity of overexpression of the AS1 or AS2genes under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CAMV) 35S promoter. Although plants with as1 and as2 mutations have very similar phenotypes, 35S::AS1/Ler and 35S::AS2/Lertransgenic plants showed dramatically different morphologies. A possible model of the AS1, AS2 and ER action in leaf polarity formation is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Talbert, P. B., Adler, H. T., Parks, D. W., & Comai, L. (1995) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.121.9.2723 · Cited by 365
Cited by
BLADE-ON-PETIOLE–Dependent Signaling Controls Leaf and Floral Patterning in Arabidopsis
Hepworth, S. R., Zhang, Y., McKim, S., Li, X., & Haughn, G. W. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.104.030536 · Cited by 351
Alvarez-Buylla, E. R., Benítez, M., Corvera-Poiré, A., Chaos Cador, Á., de Folter, S., Gamboa de Buen, A., Garay-Arroyo, A., García-Ponce, B., Jaimes-Miranda, F., Pérez-Ruiz, R. V., et al. (2010) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0127 · Cited by 298
Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor
Wang, S., Bai, Y., Shen, C., Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Jiang, D., Guilfoyle, T. J., Chen, M., & Qi, Y. (2010) · Functional & Integrative Genomics · doi:10.1007/s10142-010-0174-3 · Cited by 297
Defining the boundaries: structure and function of LOB domain proteins
Majer, C., & Hochholdinger, F. (2011) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.009 · Cited by 272
Ikezaki, M., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., Kojima, S., Ueno, Y., Machida, C., & Machida, Y. (2010) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2009.04033.x · Cited by 97
Rast, M. I., & Simon, R. (2012) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.112.099978 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, L., Xu, Y., Dong, A., Sun, Y., Pi, L., Xu, Y., & Huang, H.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4097-4107
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2157817370
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
