The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration
Abstract
The tail of the Xenopus tadpole will regenerate following amputation, and all three of the main axial structures – the spinal cord, the notochord and the segmented myotomes – are found in the regenerated tail. We have investigated the cellular origin of each of these three tissue types during regeneration. We produced Xenopus laevis embryos transgenic for the CMV (Simian Cytomegalovirus) promoter driving GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) ubiquitously throughout the embryo. Single tissues were then specifically labelled by making grafts at the neurula stage from transgenic donors to unlabelled hosts. When the hosts have developed to tadpoles, they carry a region of the appropriate tissue labelled with GFP. These tails were amputated through the labelled region and the distribution of labelled cells in the regenerate was followed. We also labelled myofibres using the Cre-lox method. The results show that the spinal cord and the notochord regenerate from the same tissue type in the stump, with no labelling of other tissues. In the case of the muscle, we show that the myofibres of the regenerate arise from satellite cells and not from the pre-existing myofibres. This shows that metaplasia between differentiated cell types does not occur, and that the process of Xenopus tail regeneration is more akin to tissue renewal in mammals than to urodele tail regeneration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration
Kragl, M., Knapp, D., Nacu, E., Khattak, S., Maden, M., Epperlein, H. H., & Tanaka, E. M. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08152 · Cited by 850
Brown, D. D., & Cai, L. (2007) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.021 · Cited by 498
Comparative Aspects of Animal Regeneration
Brockes, J. P., & Kumar, A. (2008) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175336 · Cited by 490
Sugimoto, K., Gordon, S. P., & Meyerowitz, E. M. (2011) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2010.12.004 · Cited by 349
Sandoval-Guzmán, T., Wang, H., Khattak, S., Schuez, M., Roensch, K., Nacu, E., Tazaki, A., Joven, A., Tanaka, E. M., & Simon, A. (2014) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.11.007 · Cited by 326
Adams, D. S., Masi, A., & Levin, M. (2007) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.02812 · Cited by 268
Identification of a regeneration-organizing cell in the Xenopus tail
Aztekin, C., Hiscock, T. W., Marioni, J. C., Gurdon, J. B., Simons, B. D., & Jullien, J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav9996 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Gargioli, C., & Slack, J. M. W.
- Venue
- Development
- Publisher
- The Company of Biologists
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2669-2679
- ISSN
- 0950-1991 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9129
- OpenAlex
- W2067297765
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.