Cited by 142Planarian Biology and ElectrostimulationDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationWound Healing and Treatments

Identification of a regeneration-organizing cell in the Xenopus tail

Open access
Aztekin, C., Hiscock, T. W., Marioni, J. C., Gurdon, J. B., Simons, B. D., Jullien, J.·2019·Science

Abstract

A tale of tadpole tail regeneration: Some vertebrates, including some amphibians, show a remarkable, if sometimes restricted, ability to regenerate lost appendages. Aztekin et al. compared naturally occurring regeneration-competent and -incompetent Xenopus laevis tadpoles using single-cell messenger RNA sequencing. They identified regeneration-organizing cells (ROCs) that could coordinate tail regeneration. Relocation of ROCs from the body to the amputation plane enabled specialized wound epidermis formation and subsequent regeneration. ROCs simultaneously expressed many different ligands that can induce proliferation of different progenitor cell populations. Thus, by signaling to underlying progenitors, ROCs orchestrate the growth of a new appendage. Science , this issue p. 653

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aav9996

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the compendium, fourteen studies had control groups that included six or more samples.

    “Within our compendium, we identified a total of fourteen studies with control groups that included six or more samples5,6,15,49–59.”

    From Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression (2021) · cites this paper as [53]

    The study description (section labeled Abstract; page not provided) reports uninjured, intact-tail samples alongside amputated-tail samples, supporting its identification as a study with a control condition. It says there were at least two biological replicates per condition, but does not establish that the control group had six or more samples. The count of fourteen studies is the citing authors’ compendium count, not a finding attributed to this individual source. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aztekin, C., Hiscock, T. W., Marioni, J. C., Gurdon, J. B., Simons, B. D., & Jullien, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Wellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Aztekin, C.
  • Hiscock, T. W.
  • Simons, B. D.
  • Jullien, J.
Venue
Science
Published
2019-05-17
Volume
364
Issue
6441
Pages
653-658
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2946771864
Cited by
142
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 8
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Cancer Research UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
tadpole tail regeneration, Xenopus, tail amputation, wound epidermis, single-cell RNA sequencing, cell fate specification, cell transplantation, tissue regeneration
MeSH terms
Epidermal Cells, Animals, Epidermis, Tail, Xenopus laevis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Xenopus Proteins, Single-Cell Analysis, Transcriptome, Re-Epithelialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review